Search for: "WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS" Results 1341 - 1360 of 4,153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2017, 7:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
  The appeals court thus remanded to the district court for additional findings as to whether the 100-foot buffer was supported by a significant governmental interest and narrow tailoring. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:09 am by Jeff Welty
In the past several years, courts in Arizona, Mississippi, and Wisconsin have sided with prisoners suing officials over extreme heat. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am by vforberger
In Fugh, an en banc panel of the state’s appeals court rejected this argument and explained (Fugh, 153 A.2d at 1176-7, footnote omitted): A statute should be construed, if possible, to give effect to all its provisions. 1 Pa. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:59 am by Altman & Altman
If the court does not agree to vacate the past ruling in Avery’s case, he will have to file an appeal, which may or may not be successful. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford, in which the Supreme Court will decide whether Wisconsin’s electoral maps are the product of an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander, “correct[s] a couple misconceptions” arising out of last Tuesday’s oral argument. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 11:12 am by Carmen N. Couden
According to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers employers in Indiana, Illinois, and Wisconsin) the answer to that question is not very much. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:46 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
They generally involve questions of Indiana, Illinois, or Wisconsin law. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
  In a 2013 decision, the same court reached a similar conclusion, but was reversed on appeal on standing grounds. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:51 am by Holland & Hart
The federal court in Wisconsin rejected the claim as a matter of law, entering summary judgment in favor of Heartland Woodcraft, and Severson appealed. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen speculates about whether the plaintiffs will ask the Supreme Court to lift its stay of the lower court’s order requiring the Wisconsin legislature to draw new districts by November, asking “why … Wisconsin voters [should] endure another election with an unconstitutional map, if we know where this thing is going to end up? [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:00 am by vforberger
NOTE: An explanation for why management wanted changes to substantial fault and misconduct is provided, however: Due to recent decisions of the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals regarding discharge for misconduct and substantial fault, the Management members of the Council propose to amend the definitions of “misconduct” and “substantial fault” in order to clarify legislative intent. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:03 pm by Mark Walsh
A federal district court invalidated the map last year as a partisan gerrymander, and the case is here on direct appeal. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:12 am by Derek T. Muller
Whitford, an appeal from a three-judge panel finding that Wisconsin's state legislative redistricting was an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, with the Edward J. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 3:48 am by Bob Ortbals
And several other federal appeals courts have recognized multi-month leaves as reasonable accommodations. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 3:07 am by Scott Bomboy
Wisconsin is appealing a ruling that struck down a redistricting map created after the 2010 census. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:15 am by Michael Froomkin
DeShaney is notorious as an opinion in which the Supreme Court held that the state of Wisconsin had no duty under the Constitution to protect a boy, the infamous “poor Joshua” of Justice Blackmun’s dissent, from a permanently disabling beating by his father. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:56 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit disagreed, ruling for Murphy Oil. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
  The appeals court thus remanded to the district court for additional findings as to whether the 100-foot buffer was supported by a significant governmental interest and narrow tailoring. [read post]