Search for: "Will Baude" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, some prominent originalists, including Professors Baude and Paulsen, have quickly jumped ship. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:04 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
Prior to the election, William Baude wrote that “Professor Tillman’s theory makes sense of patterns that most of us never saw. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:12 pm by Adam Thierer
TLF readers will definitely want to check out the online symposium underway over at the Concurring Opinions blog debating the thesis set forth in Jonathan Zittrain’s important 2008 book, The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:02 am by Josh Blackman
My co-blogger Will Baude offers some proposals to promote transparency: All judges agree to publicly post, on Oscar or the equivalent, when they are hiring law clerks and how many positions they are trying to fill. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 4:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Now Will Baude and I (and others) have argued that in fact the First Amendment inquiry here was substantively misplaced, and coercive contributions that are used for political causes are generally not unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) The foreign emoluments clause provides that “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:46 pm by Adam Thierer
In his opening essay in this symposium, Jonathan Zittrain ensures us that he is “not exactly a pessimist. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
To the surprise of many, the Supreme Court jumped the queue to make new law on religious exemptions before it decided Fulton, via what University of Chicago Law School professor William Baude has called its “shadow docket,” decisions it makes by summary order without briefing or argument. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:15 am by The Editors
I did the whole thing over the phone with an acoustic coupler and a 300-baud modem. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:38 am by Josh Blackman
Contra Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen in the Harvard Law Review, I think there is much to praise in the per curiam decision. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
According to Koppelman's concluding paragraph, here is what originalists like Barnett, Bray, Sachs, Baude, Kopel, and Natelson think: The narrative is clear. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text should be interpreted in favor of expanding democracy. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words on January 6… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
 In this post, I’ll examine the final two “off-ramp” arguments that Donald Trump offers the Court—arguments that would have the Court reverse the judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court without adjudicating whether the Constitution precludes Trump from serving as President. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
In this post, I’ll examine the final two “off-ramp” arguments that Donald Trump offers the Court—arguments that would have the Court reverse the judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court without adjudicating whether the Constitution precludes Trump from serving as President. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:35 pm
But, just like mariners in the age of sail contemplating ocean journeys, would-be internauts faced substantial barriers to entry: only 30 years ago, internet access still required access to a mainframe somewhere and thus tended to be limited to scientists and academics, and the data moved at a mere trickle as machines mostly communicated via modems with baud speeds we sneer at today. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Asay cdasay BYU Richard Ashcroft qmulbioethics Queen Mary London Jonathan Askin jaskin Brooklyn Lisa Austin Lisa_M_Austin Toronto Regina Austin raustin92913 Penn Ian Ayres iayres Yale Barbara Babcock bababcock Stanford Sandra Babcock sandralbabcock Cornell Sam Bagenstos sbagen Michigan Stephen Bainbridge ProfBainbridge UCLA Jeffrey Baker JRBProf Faulkner Jack Balkin jackbalkin Yale David Ball wdavidball Santa Clara Derek Bambauer dbambauer Arizona Jennifer Bankier jbankier Dalhousie John Banzhaf… [read post]