Search for: "Williams v. United States Post Office"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
In Blum v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am
Rowan Williams on church law The Anglican Communion Office is in the process of revising The Principles of Canon Law Common to the Churches of the Anglican Communion. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
§ 546, provides that “the Attorney General may appoint a United States attorney for the district in which the office of United States attorney is vacant,” so long as the person appointed by the AG is not someone whom the President has tried to appoint as U.S. attorney but whom the Senate has “refused” to confirm, and so long as the AG’s appointment does not last more than “120 days. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch) Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and then… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [duncanbucknell.com]Highlights this week included:EU wants 95 year copyright on recordings: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IP Law360),Harvard Arts and Sciences Faculty decides to allow open access to research: (Techdirt), (Michael Geist), (Ars Technica), (Against Monopoly),Summary judgment hearing 8 Feb: Tafas & GSK v Dudas concerning implementation of the USPTO’s new… [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
In Kansas v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Since the early 1930s – when theorists in the United States began arguing over the corporate objective – legal restrictions and requirements have dramatically limited those choices, largely for the benefit of stakeholders who are not shareholders. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
Inforrm had a post on the decision. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
The office of court administration shall determine and publish the income cap. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 9:47 pm
" State v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Office of the Clermont County Sheriff, No. 06-4431 (6th Cir. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:06 am
The case under discussion today has the truly odd name of USA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
See Post 001. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
And why did the Antiquities Trafficking Unit not seek indictment? [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Network v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:56 am
"Officers of the United States" must be appointed pursuant to the Appointments Clause. [read post]
