Search for: "50 Doe Defendants" Results 1361 - 1380 of 7,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 7:37 am by Florian Mueller
I have no idea what Ford's envisioned endgame is...Avanci's GM deal does not fit the narrative of some of the patent pool's detractors who say or suggest that only premium brands from Europe accept its licensing terms. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:51 pm by Dan Murphy
Some type of revenge porn law, however, is already on the books in 38 of the 50 states. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
As the result of events outlined below, Syed Abid Iqbal filed a lawsuit in federal court in which he asserted “five claims against the individual Defendants”, one of which was that the Defendants “violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 50 U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
How does a defendant (the accused) produce “evidence to the contrary” for purposes of challenging its reliability? [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:53 pm by Allie
  It's unlikely the settlement was nowhere near the $50 million demand, but even a if it was a fraction of that, how many magazines does Star even sell? [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am by MBettman
Gardner, 2012-Ohio-5683 (An individual who is the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant does not forfeit all expectations of privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The defendant also made double walled glasses. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:40 am by Lewis Gainor
This means that whatever number is on paper, e.g. the sentencing order, the defendant serves 50 percent of that time. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
  It’s not salaries, so since the public defenders are all on salary, that report says no payment data. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:57 pm by Jennifer Granick
  Questions as to Statistics on Collection and Use ·      How does the IC respond to the Washington Post report from July of 2014 that 50% of section 702 data concerns Americans and 90% of the data concerns non-targets? [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:20 am by privacylawyer
… [79]           Thus, the IPC’s statutory duty to inquire, and LifeLabs’ duty to respond, does not permit a claim of litigation privilege over facts obtained through its lawyers, even where those facts might also play a role in defending against parallel civil litigation. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 3:30 am
The appellate decision does not reveal any additional facts, such as the percentage membership interest of the plaintiff and whether, for instance, the issue concerning the attorney’s authority to act on behalf of the company arose because the plaintiff and defendants were 50/50 members. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:32 am by Jon Sands
The defendant argued that the statute, 50 U.S.C. 1705, was vague. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:46 am
The 9th does remand for resentencing because the adjustment in this fraud sentencing for 50+ victims was not supported by evidence but was speculation. [read post]