Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
Puhlhofer [1986] AC 486. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of K and AC Jackson and Son) v DEFRA – read judgment. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
The Court of Appeal noted that it was extremely unlikely that the draughtsman of the 1995 Act had used the term enjoyment in a more extensive manner than that set out by the House of Lords in Southwark London Borough Council v Tanner & Others [2001] 1 AC. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
Ward LJ also drew support from the Supreme Court’s judgment in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cardinal Vaughan Memorial School, R (on the application of) v The Archbishop of Westminster & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 433 (14 April 2011) H and L v A City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 403 (14 April 2011) Marcroft v Heartland (Midlands) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 438 (14 April 2011) Desai v National Car Parks Services (NCP) [2011] EWCA Civ 402 (14 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Deeney, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 893 (14… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Doody [1994] 1 AC para 531 at page 560.) [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
The ability of public bodies to bring claims in defamation In Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd the House of Lords held that a local authority could not bring a claim in libel in respect of its governmental and administrative functions ([1993] AC 534) Subsequent case law suggests that the ambit of the doctrine is broader and applies to agencies and companies that exercise some form of governmental function. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
In Shevill v Presse Alliance ([1996] AC 959 and [1995] ECR I-415) it was held that publication of defamatory material in this jurisdiction is a “harmful event” for the purposes of Art. 5(3). [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
Thus R. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a… [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
” (Hays Plc v Hartley [2010] EWHC 1068 (QB) at [62]). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:16 am
Level 2 equipment which provides charging through a 240 V, AC plug, can take 3 to 8 hours to reach a full charge, adding about 25 miles of range per hour of charging time, depending on the vehicle. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
Perindopril erbumine is a long-acting ACE (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme) inhibitor used for treating hypertension and cardiac insufficiency. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
There were 21 state cases decided by 47 judges. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:09 am
Sources and further reading: The Authors' Guild et al v Google Inc, 05 Civ. 8136 (DC), 48 pages The proposed settlement agreement here, 323 pages Google Book Settlement website here "GBS Update: the Settlement Is Dead; Long Live the Settlement Negotiations! [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:30 pm
Co-operators General Insurance Co., 2002 SCC 30, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 129, and ACS Public Sector Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
