Search for: "Adams v. New York"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
Other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, William Mears of CNN, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:06 am
"Justices Consider Whether Tossing Out Fish Destroyed Records": Adam Liptak has this article in today's edition of The New York Times. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am
Other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Jeremy P. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
The exchange between Stevens and Chief Justice Roberts over the Court’s expansion of the issue in the reargument was well captured by Adam Liptak in a New York Times analysis at the time. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:31 am
In The New York Times, Adam Liptak covers the weekend appearance at Yale Law School by Justices Clarence Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor, and Samuel Alito, all of whom graduated from the school. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
You may not have heard of the lawsuit Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
"Regulatory Case in North Carolina Appears to Trouble Supreme Court": Adam Liptak has this article in today's edition of The New York Times. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:28 am
In his Sidebar column for The New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses the Court and its ban on free speech on the marble plaza in front of the Court building. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:47 am
New York, a 1999 dispute over Ellis Island; or New Hampshire v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am
Smith & Philip Donoho, RLUIPA: Re-Aligning Burdens of Proof, Clarifying Freedoms, and Re-Defining Responsibilities, (New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, Forthcoming).Zachary R. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 1:31 pm
Yesterday, Adam Liptak published the story, Justices Hear Case on Allowing Testimony by Jurors, in the New York Times. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:27 pm
"Justices Hear Case on Allowing Testimony by Jurors": Adam Liptak will have this article in Thursday's edition of The New York Times. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
"Supreme Court Weighs Employee Pay for Amazon's After-Work Security Screening": Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this news update. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
In the Times Insider section of The New York Times (subscription required), Susan Lehman interviews Adam Liptak about his work covering the Court and the Supreme Court press corps. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am
Other previews come from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Richard Wolf of USA Today (who has another preview here), Marcia Coyle and Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal (registration or subscription required), Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, and Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm
USGS Professional Paper: 1798-L Post-Hurricane Sandy coastal oblique aerial photographs collected from Cape Lookout, North Carolina, to Montauk, New York, November 4-6, 2012 2014, Morgan, Karen L. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:47 am
In his Sidebar column for The New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses the same-sex marriage issue in the context of the Court’s tendency to release major opinions late in the Term; he observes that, although “[t]here are lots of open questions about the road the Supreme Court justices will take to a final decision about whether the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage, . . . one thing seems clear: The answer will arrive next June. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
For example, in a New York Times column in late July, Adam Liptak asked whether it may be difficult for the Supreme Court to invalidate state bans given the findings of certain lower courts that animus toward gay people played no role in the enactment of some such bans.I responded in part that the Court does not define animus as limited to malice or intent to harm—it also understands animus to include expressions of moral opposition to homosexuality, evidence… [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
As summarized above, combined commercial and noncommercial speech that “communicates information, expresses opinion, recites grievances, protests claimed abuses, or solicits financial support on behalf of a movement whose existence and objectives are matters of public concern, [] is not purely commercial” and is afforded full First Amendment protection. [15] In City of New York v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 8:34 am
Adam Liptak, Supreme Court Correspondent, New York Times National Press Club Washington, DC [read post]
