Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2015, 10:42 am
Indeed, in a recent decision, Arnold v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
” – the court has provided guidance on the relevance of this issue to the question of “outstanding benefit” in the long running dispute of Shanks v Unilever PLC and others [2017] EWCA Civ 2. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:04 am
| Anne Frank's diary & geoblocking | Magic Leap lampoons Google Glass | Arnold's decision in Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar RT v Generics| US Trade Secrets Act passes House | Publishing and the Machine| DSM Communication on Platforms leaked! [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:06 pm
V-I. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
This is largely derived from the reasoning of Lord Wilberforce in General Tire v Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Limited [1975] 2 All ER 173 – a patent case in which it was held that "[d]amages should be liberally assessed but.. the object is to compensate the plaintiffs and not punish the defendants".The court is looking for the royalty which "would have been arrived at in negotiations between the parties, had each been making reasonable use of their respective… [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:34 pm
One of the issues dealt with was the approach of the English courts to the shape of taxis, which did not score high on the distinctiveness graph in the a quo (earlier) judgment of the well-known jurist Judge Arnold in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as the London Taxi Company v Frazer-Nash Research Limitedand (2) Ecotive Limited [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch). [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:06 pm
Also, today (5 November), the ECJ heard L'Oreal v Bellure. [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:48 am
In 1987, in McCleskey v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 6:51 am
The US government has filed a civil forfeiture claim against Gibson, United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
” Arnold v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
So held Mr Justice Arnold this morning in Diageo v Intercontinental Brands [2010] EWHC 17 (Ch). [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
In State of Missouri v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 9:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
Good stuff, but inside baseball.)One of your humble scribes -- Herrmann -- participated (with Rob Weiner, of Arnold & Porter) in a webcast earlier today about Riegel v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:24 pm
Reitman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:37 am
Ronald Dean Arnold Malvitz challenged the language of the Vehicle Code in the 1992 case of People v. [read post]
