Search for: "B. Smith" Results 1361 - 1380 of 5,330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
There will be a discussion after Smith’s presentation moderated by Darrell West. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am by CMS
Earlier this year, two editors of the UKSC Blog, Jack Ballantyne and Louise Pearce, were invited to interview Lord Briggs at the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 1:10 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Friday’s case for example Owner of property lives in Pakistan, he uses Fred Smith Lettings based in the high street to source a tenant for this three-bed family home. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 10:37 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 12:01 am by Tessa Shepperson
There is a call to boycott businesses which support Shelter, such as B&Q and M&S. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 6:56 am by Dennis Crouch
  The moot court is sponsored by McKool Smith and so the winner receives $1,000. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by David Post
" Paul's brief argues they got it wrong: Arizona can, consistent with the Constitution, "categorically deny bail based on the charged offense if it can show that defendants charged with that offense categorically present a continuing danger to the community," and "a well-supported charge of sexual assault is a sufficient proxy for future dangerousness": As this Court recognized in Smith v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by David Post
" Paul's brief argues they got it wrong: Arizona can, consistent with the Constitution, "categorically deny bail based on the charged offense if it can show that defendants charged with that offense categorically present a continuing danger to the community," and "a well-supported charge of sexual assault is a sufficient proxy for future dangerousness": As this Court recognized in Smith v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm by Samuel Bray
In particular, the historians' brief (a) downplays the evidence in work by Steve Yeazell and Bob Bone that the parties and non-parties who could jointly benefit from a bill of peace were a preexisting cohesive social unit like a group of parishioners (neither Yeazell nor Bone is cited); (b) ignores the conceptual development of the bill of peace for municipal taxpayers out of that theory of a preexisting cohesive social unit; (c) relies on late nineteenth-century extensions of the… [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm by Samuel Bray
In particular, the historians' brief (a) downplays the evidence in work by Steve Yeazell and Bob Bone that the parties and non-parties who could jointly benefit from a bill of peace were a preexisting cohesive social unit like a group of parishioners (neither Yeazell nor Bone is cited); (b) ignores the conceptual development of the bill of peace for municipal taxpayers out of that theory of a preexisting cohesive social unit; (c) relies on late nineteenth-century extensions of the… [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 8:27 am
 Site-specific cat.Sculpture by Wang Du, exhibited by the Museum of Cat in 2017Moreover, as described in the chapter by Donn Zaretsky,** we encounter the dispute between installation artist Christoph Büchel and the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art as evidence of VARA’s [relative] success at granting relief to artists when “a museum behaves badly” (citing New York Times art critic Robert Smith’s, p. 50, ‘Training Ground for Moral… [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:48 am by Eugene Volokh
" "A informs his daughter B that there is a rumor that C, B's fiance, is an embezzler. [read post]