Search for: "BULL V US" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard  22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Spicer v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard 1 to 5 February 2021 (Julian Knowles… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am by Samuel Bray
Bull. 37, 41–47 (2020); with Mila Sohoni, The Power to Vacate a Rule, 88 Geo. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Delaware is one of only three states where a judge can overrule a jury's decision not to impose a death sentence.This is an intentionally misleading half-truth of the kind the anti-death-penalty movement uses all the time. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Jury finds for plaintiff in VirnetX v Microsoft (EDTexweblog.com)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Microsoft - Microsoft sues maker of four-minute exercise machine for typosquatting: Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:25 am
Last week, the IPKat certainly supplied us all with an abundance of trade mark law updates! [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
THE DUTY OF CANDOR---NOT TO BE TRIFLED WITH Government lawyers dodged two bullets when the Ackies cert petition was denied:  their failure to clarify the factual distinction between cell tower data, created by the carrier in the ordinary course of its business, versus GPS ping data, created at the direction of law enforcement solely for use in a criminal investigation; their inconsistent legal position on whether tracking software fits within the statutory… [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]
Red Bull v Monster[2]demonstrated recently it is possible – however, if the later mark is not confusingly similar to the earlier mark, and the Opponent cannot prove that the Applicant intended to ride on its coat-tails, then the change in economic behaviour will depend on an actual image transfer (from RED DAWG to RED BULL, or HOUSE OF ZANA to ZARA). [read post]
Red Bull v Monster[2]demonstrated recently it is possible – however, if the later mark is not confusingly similar to the earlier mark, and the Opponent cannot prove that the Applicant intended to ride on its coat-tails, then the change in economic behaviour will depend on an actual image transfer (from RED DAWG to RED BULL, or HOUSE OF ZANA to ZARA). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Steven M. Gursten
HB 4936 returns us to the problems No-Fault fixed nearly 40 years ago, and will be particularly devastating for injury victims in cities like Detroit and Pontiac “Those who choose to ignore history doom the rest of us by repeating it. [read post]