Search for: "Bad v. Smith" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
McKee, No. 06-1606 An order conditionally granting petitioner habeas relief based on prosecutorial misconduct is reversed where: 1) the prosecutor relied in good faith on evidentiary rulings which permitted him to use prior bad acts evidence before trial to establish the identity of the [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:32 am
I know it is a bad habit, but I only have so much time. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry),… [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
For this reason, Allstate should not have had a default judgment entered against it on the bad faith claim. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
" Judge Smith warned: The majority's bad policy choice is more important than the flaws in its reasoning. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 4:39 am
Smith, No. 05-50375 (3-31-08). [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Afro-IP),If education and pricing policy fail, says Adobe in Nigeria, we can still sue: (Afro-IP),South African arm of Chrysler objects to advertisement by Indian vehicle maker Mahindra and Mahindra that uses the term "jeep": (Afro-IP), (Spicy IP),Kenya’s call for anti-counterfeit legislation… amongst other changes: (Afro-IP),Kenya: Shared computer use raises privacy, confidentiality issues: (Afro-IP)AustraliaChanges to grace period for trade mark renewal:… [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 6:52 am
The Metropolitan News-Enterprise reports on a charming little case called Shalant v. [read post]