Search for: "Baker v. State"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 3,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2016, 6:48 am
Successes in the campaign for same-sex marriage intensified controversies over whether state anti-discrimination laws should cover bakers, photographers and others who refuse to offer their wedding services to same-sex couples.2. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 1:02 pm
Baker in the Southern District and assigned Case No. 1:16-cv-03379-RLY-TAB. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
Orin Kerr responded to April Doss’s earlier post on United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Baker v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Baker v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Baker v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Baker v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:42 pm
Baker – are once again absent from the argument calendar. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
If Baker v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 6:13 am
Baker III, the secretary of state under President George Bush, and Robert M. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am
And April Doss defended the 9th Circuit’s reading of the government’s ability to use information collected through 702 surveillance in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:54 am
Baker), has not yet been scheduled for oral argument, but all three cases are ones in which Scalia was likely among the four justices who voted to grant. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
David Ryan previewed the oral argument in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 5:23 pm
The First Amendment doesn’t apply to such private businesses (incidentally, whether or not they take government funds, see Rendell-Baker v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:22 am
Justice Baker joined that concurrence. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
Waitangi Day protest, 2006 (Photo by Flickr user Charlie Brewer, Feb. 6, 2006, used under Creative Commons License 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). 1901: In Nireaha Tamaki v Baker, the Privy Council in London ruled that the courts did have jurisdiction to determine whether the land in dispute had been ceded to the Crown, in contrast to the approach that the New Zealand courts had taken since the Wi Parata case. [read post]
