Search for: "Barrett v. State"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,032
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
The Court could have easily GVR'd the 6th Circuit's panel, and stated that it did not faithfully apply Diocese. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 7:01 am
The Supreme Court decided Texas v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:09 pm
In Patterson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Barrett, Michael Gerhardt and Kermit Roosevelt III [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
The result was a hodgepodge of conflicting opinions and at least four main treatments described by then-Judge Barrett in Gadelhak v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am
By the time Indiana appealed its loss at the Seventh Circuit, SCOTUS would include Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and many court-watchers wondered whether the change to the bench would result in the Court’s eroding its landmark decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
Texas v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:13 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 9:02 am
Justice Barrett did not participate. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm
And, Justice Barrett did not signal her recusal. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 11:00 am
The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously reinstated the rape convictions of three former servicemen in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
Bell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:59 am
The decision in Rutledge v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm
The question this time, in Facebook v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:13 pm
In Tanzin v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:23 am
” Thomas acknowledged that the Supreme Court had ruled in 2011 in Sossamon v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:54 am
Next to be released was United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:05 am
Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court, Justice Barrett not participating, in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm
AT&T Servs., Inc., 950 F.3d 458, 464, 469 (7th Cir. 2020) (Coney Barrett, J.); Glasser v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm
AT&T Servs., Inc., 950 F.3d 458, 464, 469 (7th Cir. 2020) (Coney Barrett, J.); Glasser v. [read post]
