Search for: "CRIM" Results 1361 - 1380 of 4,178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2013, 11:36 am by Dan Markel
I'm home now, after a few days in NYC last week, where Eric Johnson (Illinois) and Rachel Barkow (NYU) presented drafts at the crim law theory colloquium. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am by INFORRM
In R v Ahmed Faraz [2012] EWCA Crim 2820 a man dubbed ‘the terrorists’ favourite bookseller’ successfully challenged seven convictions for disseminating ‘terrorist publications’ under s.2 of the Terrorism Act 2006. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 3:44 pm by familoo
Just like my horsehair I’m always conscious its there, it’s hot and itchy and sometimes I’d quite like to take it off, but – as the crims say – it’s part of the uniform that helps you draw that line. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 8:44 am
Wilfegher Dumay, 2012KN024855, NYLJ 1202575279850, at *1 (Crim., KI, Decided October 4, 2012), exemplifies these issues and the importance of a criminal lawyer who wants to do more than merely attempt to work out a "deal." [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:40 am by Bart Torvik
Well, I just pulled out my old Criminal Law textbook and found the case (with the help of my Crim Law "outline," which, yes I still have). [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am by sally
Regina v Nursing [2012] EWCA Crim 2521; [2012] WLR (D) 360 “The offence of wilfully neglecting a person who lacked capacity, contrary to section 44(2) of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, was not legally uncertain. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:19 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K (Children), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 1549 (29 November 2012) Alfa Laval Tumba AB & Anor v Separator Spares International Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 1569 (29 November 2012) Birmingham City Council v Ashton [2012] EWCA Civ 1557 (29 November 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ligaya Nursing v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2521 (30 November 2012) Ravjani & Ors, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2519 (29 November 2012) Shabir, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2564… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 4:14 am by tracey
Regina v Bateman; Regina v Doyle: [2012] EWCA Crim 2158;   [2012] WLR (D)  355 “Where an offender was committed to the Crown Court by the magistrates’ court under paragraph 11(2)(a) of Schedule 12 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to be dealt with in respect of the commission of an offence committed during the operational period of a suspended sentence imposed by the Crown Court, the Crown Court’s sentencing powers in relation to other offences in respect of… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 4:04 am by tracey
Regina v Abbas and another: [2012] EWCA Crim 2517;   [2012] WLR (D)  352 “Where the Crown alleged that the defendant was part of a joint enterprise involving the possession of an imitation firearm, proof of which depended upon the drawing of an inference, it was incumbent on a judge in summing up to identify the evidence of primary fact upon the basis of which, if it was accepted, a jury might infer knowledge and thus possession by the defendant as well as the… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 5:39 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
I’m in the “Niche” category since Taxes aren’t sensational enough to warrant their own category like Crim Law. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by btrippodo
crim*” will retrieve results that include words such as criminal, crime, crimes and other words with the prefix “crim” -          Phrases in Quotations -          Logical Operators Note: operators must be in upper case letters Ex. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:02 pm
Sincere Kingsbarry, 2011KN056538, NYLJ 1202577064424, at *1 (Crim., KI, Decided October 26, 2012), the defendant was riding his bicycle where prohibited in violation of a local New York City law (on the side walk...uh oh!). [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
Oakes & Ors v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2435 - ‘Whole life’ sentences in exceptionally serious circumstances don’t contravene Article 3 ECHR, rules Court of Appeal. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:09 pm by Rosalind English
Oakes and others v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2435 – read judgment The imposition of whole life orders for extremely serious crimes does not violate the prohibition on inhuman and degrading treatment under Article 3. [read post]