Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 1361 - 1380 of 4,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2020, 6:31 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Faced with mixed jurisprudence from other jurisdictions, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal answers this question for that province in Crook v Druxbury, 2020 SKCA 43 (CanLII), rendering a decision that is harmonious with the state of the law in Alberta and British Columbia. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 11:27 am
Bahar Idriss Abu Garda and The Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm by Theodore Shaw
Chambers Distinguished Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Civil Rights at the University of North Carolina School of Law at Chapel Hill. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Sued if you do, sued if you don’t: drugmaker faces lawsuits over failure to provide Fosamax warning that FDA told it not to provide [Jim Copland, James Beck on Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:42 pm by lennyesq
Dean Salkin joined with nine other law professors in an amicus brief to the NY Appellate Division, 3rd Dept. in Norse Energy v Town of Dryden. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:42 pm by lennyesq
Dean Salkin joined with nine other law professors in an amicus brief to the NY Appellate Division, 3rd Dept. in Norse Energy v Town of Dryden. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:10 am by Broc Romanek
It still is likely to get passed soon enough – but the Chamber of Commerce has written letters to state legislators that has delayed the debate on the bill for the time being… More on our “Proxy Season Blog” We continue to post new items regularly on our “Proxy Season Blog” for TheCorporateCounsel.net members. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Certiorari stage documents: §  Opinion below (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit) §  Petition for certiorari §  Brief in opposition §  Petitioners’ reply §  Amicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States §  Amicus brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation §  Amicus brief of DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar §  Amicus brief of the Washington Legal Foundation Title:… [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 6:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
So that ACLU or Chamber of Commerce apparel -- to extent anything like that actually exists -- would be prohibited in polling places as well. [read post]