Search for: "Clark v. Wells" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2013, 9:01 am by Tim Sitzmann
(Imagine your grandchildren asking incredulously, “You mean the Volkswagen ‘V’ used to mean peace? [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 12:45 pm
Thanks, Birgit Clark (who else?) [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
As I emerge from nappies, crying, baby vomit and all of that baby glamour, I’ve finally found a moment to reflect on the last six (well, seven) months of trade mark disputes.1. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Answer: Well, there have been several consequences: notably, longer, more heavily footnoted opinions. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Williams 13-587Issue: Whether the court of appeals exceeded its authority to grant a writ of habeas corpus when it completely disregarded and ignored this Court’s well-established precedent of Woodford v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Whatever rules the plaintiffs get to play by should apply to us as well. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Will Baude
As a matter of practice, it is common ground among the various views that the vacancy must be “fill[ed]”—as well as “happen”—“during the recess of the Senate. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:22 pm by Kim Krawiec
In Commercial Surrogate Motherhood and the Alleged Commodification of Children: A Defense of Legally Enforceable Contracts, Hugh V. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:13 pm by Corey McGehee
  As Dick Clark presciently recognized on American Bandstand, the song is “a little unusual, a little strange,” and so is the dispute in Everly v. [read post]
In a statement, Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said: Far too often, people with mental health disabilities are institutionalized when they could succeed and thrive in the community. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:57 am by Adam Wagner
However, they have been waiting since 2005 and may well be waiting for longer yet. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:01 am by Joy Waltemath
An employee who tested positive for alcohol after fracturing her ankle on the job had her ADA claim tossed on summary judgment after a federal district court in Mississippi concluded that she could not show her injury substantially limited a major life activity or that her termination under the employer’s zero-tolerance policy was pretextual (Clark v. [read post]