Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In theory it’s recursive—policing might have effects on what the public thinks—but courts look at what the TM owner does as if intent mattered. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 1:58 am by SHG
  Aside from a few organizations, like the ACLU or Public Citizen, dedicated to fighting the fight, large or small, to make a point, there are few who would even bother. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 5:22 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The original for this post is Does The Philly Fire Dept’s Social Media Policy Violate The First Amendment? [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am by Bexis
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748 (1976), is listed as a “fraud” case. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:47 am by Laura Orr
Does the price quoted include search, copy, and delivery? [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm by Leland E. Beck
Sebelius), the other enjoining the rule as it may be applied to a single for-profit company owned by a family with religious beliefs contrary to the rule (Newland v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm by Leland E. Beck
Sebelius), the other enjoining the rule as it may be applied to a single for-profit company owned by a family with religious beliefs contrary to the rule (Newland v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by DaytonDUI
 Later the ODH changed what records were accessible to the public. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:08 am by Beth Stephens
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
Its main argument was that only EU citizens and companies could register such domain names. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:03 pm by Eric E. Johnson
… Unlike other famous secrets whose sources were protected in order to inform citizens of government corruption and public misconduct, the sole purpose of the TechnoBuffalo solicitation is to promote TechnoBuffalo, without a second thought as to what harm it may cause lawful and productive companies whose stolen information it leaks. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:42 pm by P.J. Blount
Private companies like Google and Microsoft have satellite images of the entire planet available to the public online. [read post]