Search for: "DAVID N." Results 1361 - 1380 of 5,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
David Whelan 4. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:21 am by David Post
  Some of you may have seen the article by David Segal in the Sunday NY Times several weeks ago [available here] about a rather sordid copyright fracas in which I have been embroiled over the past few months. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:01 pm by David Smith
The post Of Penalties and Possession by David Smith appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Duets Guest Blogger
- David Mitchel One of my favorite movies is Risky Business, the 1983 classic featuring a young Tom Cruise playing high school kid Joel Goodson. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:35 pm
Lemley Ask, Don't Tell: Ethical Issues Surrounding Undocumented Workers' Status in Employment Litigation Christine N. [read post]
22 May 2010, 8:20 am
" And yesterday's edition of The Washington Post contained an op-ed by Robert Merrill entitled "A veteran's Harvard ally: Elena Kagan" and an op-ed by David N. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:15 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Tesón, Enabling Monsters: A Reply to Professor MillerFeaturesMary Dowell-Jones & David Kinley, Minding the Gap: Global Finance and Human RightsJohn S. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
  El activista fallecido es David Kato, quien el año pasado interpusiera una demanda en contra de la publicación ugandesa Rolling Stones, que publicaba nombres, direcciones y fotografías de personas a quienes acusaban de homosexualidad. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:10 pm
Links de esta edición: Area Estratégica David Risley Problogger     Este podcast no sería posible sin ReduxEstudio So [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 11:43 pm
David Kretzmer who recently left Hebrew U. to join the Faculty of the Transitional Justice Institute, University of Ulster (Northern Ireland). [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:17 pm
David Fagundes’s “State Actors as First Amendment Speakers” (2006) is the most recent summary of the issue, and my sense is that there hasn’t been much resolved since then; the most recent explicit word from the Court was this passage, in U.S. v. [read post]