Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 38,447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2016, 6:44 pm
23 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
Syracuse University v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:15 am
Indeed, the FT reports that two out of three of the deals had only secondary implications in China (other reports on the deals can be found here and here). [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:51 am
From KCM Financial, et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 2:10 pm
My colleague Sandy Levinson asked me whether Roger Clemens got a raw deal. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 6:57 am
Ballotpedia asked me to contribute to a mini-symposium on how the Supreme Court may deal with the partisan gerrymandering cases cases of Gill v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 12:00 pm
On Tuesday, the top-side briefs were filed in the consolidated cases dealing with the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Safeco v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
See, Roth v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:05 am
Finally, as long as I'm here on a limited brief I'm going to use the opportunity to link up my observations on the art of the elevator speech and the oral arguments in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 7:59 am
Arlen House East Condo. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
(For all I know, there were good reasons to reject the deal, but that's obviously not the point. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:48 am
But this arrangement, which was contingent on a successful Comcast-TWC deal, fell through when the Comcast-TWC deal failed.Charter’s ensuing second round of deal making focused on acquiring Bright House and merging with TWC. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:59 pm
Thanks to AL&P, I see that the First Circuit today handed down these two opinions dealing with two different clauses of the Eighth Amendment: US v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:44 am
If nothing else, the case of Gallon v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Examples of the sort of evidence which might be relevant to drawing such inferences are given in Stack v Dowden, at para 69.(4) In those cases where it is clear either (a) that the parties did not intend joint tenancy at the outset, or (b) had changed their original intention, but it is not possible to ascertain by direct evidence or by inference what their actual intention was as to the shares in which they would own the property, “the answer is that each is entitled to that share… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:16 pm
It is only Tuesday and this week has already seen two cases generate a good deal of discussion on the LexBlog Network: Kiobel v. [read post]
19 May 2005, 1:51 pm
In dealing with the powder cocaine to crack 100-1 disparity post-Booker, U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 5:43 am
Onex Corp. has announced that Onex Partners V will acquire Newport Healthcare. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 3:06 pm
Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Matthew Billy – Senior Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: “Convicting Ahmaud Arbery’s Killers (with ADA Linda Dunikoski),” Stay Tuned with Preet, 1/13/22U.S. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 3:06 pm
Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Matthew Billy – Senior Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: “Convicting Ahmaud Arbery’s Killers (with ADA Linda Dunikoski),” Stay Tuned with Preet, 1/13/22U.S. v. [read post]
