Search for: "Defenders of Wildlife"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992) still apply for purposes of overbreadth claims under the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:11 am
Defenders of Wildlife and the Sierra Club [advocacy websites] argued that Chertoff violated the constitutional separation of powers by using his [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 5:47 am
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992). [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 4:15 am
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 2136, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:43 pm
These arguments work for farmers and ranchers, who are justified in defending their property. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
" To illustrate the first, a visit to the Defenders of Wildlife's arctic webpage reveals a collage of fuzzy friends.[14] An even more blatant example of the second can be found on the home page of the Sierra Club (probably the most influential of environmental groups). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 6:27 am
Now, for my favorite part of the DOJ's press release - "An indictment is merely an allegation, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 9:10 am
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992), and the plaintiffs probably do have standing because, well, duh, they live close to the land that is going to be turned into a LNG terminal, and the court could provide them with relief. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Wilder, No. 06-60711 In a to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit against the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks and two of its employees, dismissal of claims against one defendant is affirmed where defendant was entitled to qualified immunity because his actions, in the form of pressuring and assisting plaintiff in committing a charged crime, even to the extent that they constituted entrapment under state law, did not by themselves constitute a violation of a… [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service are affirmed over claims that: 1) the Wild Bird Act does not apply to captive-bred birds; 2) the Act is unconstitutionally vague because it does not define the term personal pet; and 3) the jury instruction given by the trial court was incorrect. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
Plaintiff National Ecological Foundation and Intervenors National Wildlife Federation and Tennessee Wildlife Federation, f/k/a Tennessee Conservation League (collectively "NEF") opposed the motion on the ground that the Agreed Order prohibited the State from undertaking the Restoration Project. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:30 am
Defenders of Wildlife. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 6:30 am
The last three could be any number of cases, but my list would include National Defenders of Wildlife, Bowles, and Ayers. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 3:24 am
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 559-60, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 4:31 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, addressed "a problem of conflicting 'shalls.'" Clean Water Act § 402(b) provides that the EPA "shall approve" transfer of National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting authority to a state upon application and a showing that the state has met nine specified criteria. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Defenders of Wildlife (06-340) and Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:27 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, the Court held that the Endangered Species Act requirement that all federal agencies "insure" their "actions" do not jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species operates where those actions are not governed by other laws having any mandatory "shalls" in them. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
Defenders of Wildlife here. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 10:06 pm
Defenders of Wildlife (NAHB). [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:38 pm
NPR's John Nielsen had this story on the Court's Defenders of Wildlife decision, which reduces the poser of the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
