Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 1361 - 1380 of 4,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
So what does this all have to do with intellectual property? [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:38 am
Can then the Commission put top-up provisions in the CTMR to override those Arts. 48(1) and 43 CTMR, or indeed require that in the new Directive? [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 10:07 am by Matthias Weller
Declaring Art. 1 (2) 2nd sentence Brussels Ibis Regulation operational wipes out for instance jurisdiction under Art. 7 (1) Brussels Ibis Regulation – but it also wipes out Art. 5 Brussels Ibis Regulation. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm by David Lat
Out of many law school students, one body politic does emerge. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:30 am by Terry Hart
Doe 1, Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause, No. 15-CV-3147 (CD Cal. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:37 pm
How does the UK use its own hybrid tools to influence both States and Non-State actors? [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:23 am by J. Mark Robinette
For example, if well #1 costs $2,000,000 and the participating owner owns 64 acres out of a 640 acre unit, the JIBS for that owner for well #1 will be $200,000. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:02 am by Dianne Saxe
Paragraph 43(1)(c) of the Act requires the Panel to “hold hearings in a manner that offers any interested party an opportunity to participate in the environmental assessment. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 7:21 am by Rumpole
 Stay with the Eagles, although under 43 is also a play now. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 4:13 am
Nonetheless, this case is closer than some others to Dastar because the content here is at least apparently editorial - that's the relevance of §43(a)(1)(B)'s commercial advertising and promotion limitation. [read post]
11 May 2022, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That the judgments have not been satisfied does not render them uncollectible, nor does the present inability to locate collateral foreclose future success. [read post]