Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 4,487
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
App. 1, 13, 707 S.E.2d 724, 733 (2011). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
The trial court made the following conclusions of law: 1. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
COA18-1016 Filed: 1 October 2019 Cabarrus County, Nos. 15CRS001292, -1293 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
COA19-24 Filed: 1 October 2019 Vance County, No. 07 CRS 50717, 50725 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:45 am
To what elements of that composition does his copyright extend? [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:26 am
The wording of the claims is not relevant for the present decision and is not reproduced here.Reasons for the DecisionPriority right (Article 87(1) EPC)1. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
This depends on whether these umbrella purchasers have a cause of action under s. 36(1) (a). [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 5:21 am
A renewed attempt at merging these two DBS platforms should, given the above, be met with substantial skepticism and reviewed thoroughly to ensure that it does not offend Section 7. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
Unger, 43 NY2d 776 [1977]). [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
Coral Ridge Ministries Media, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 8:21 pm
Alberta responded that s. 2(b) did not guarantee candidacy rights in a school board election to any particular class of persons, and was therefore not infringed: at paras. 43-44, 47. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 9:38 am
§206(a)(1), so the California minimum wage does not apply. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:47 pm
It is certainly the first decision I have seen. 43 Dudmaston, Telford, Shropshire TF3 2DF: BIR/00GF/HSH/2019/0001 This is the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decision on applications by the Borough of Telford and Wrekin for a banning order against David Beattie under section 15(1) Housing and Planning Act 2016 and for a rent repayment order under section 41 H&PA 2016. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Again Lord Keen QC notes that he would come to the rational reason shortly. 15:43: Lord Keen QC turns to address Lord Pannick’s submissions on the absence of a witness statement from the Prime Minister. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:55 am
What does that mean? [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Free Trade Ass’n, 43 USPQ2d 1282, 1285 (TTAB 1997) (quoting Univ. of Notre Dame, 217 USPQ at 509)). [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 3:10 pm
Therefore, even though the wording of Art 97(5) does not make any reference to a requirement of targeting (as Eleonora Rosati rightly notes), there may at least be some indirect reference to the concept. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:11 pm
Generally, under New Jersey’s Unemployment Compensation Law (UCL), N.J.S.A. 43:21-1 to 24.30, employers are obligated to provide compensation benefits to eligible employees who have been terminated. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
In a pair of cases that’ll be argued on October 8th—Bostock v. [read post]
