Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am
It does not require specific individuals to be named. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
Why then does Hungary play such a prominent role in the book? [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 8:39 pm
Officer (O)Yes.NMAnd Officer No. 1 told you he had picked up Defendant and given her a ride home? [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 2:27 pm
REMINDER: Commencing July 1, 2008, you must be a Registered Reader to access New York Public Personnel Law NOTICE Effective July 1, 2008, you must be a Registered Reader to access New York Public Personnel Law [Published since 2006, the quarterly index of topics covered and cases summarized since April 1, 2008 is set out below.] [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
Thus the time needed remains in control of each bencher and does not involve a risk of failure attributable to a bencher. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 7:00 am
REMINDER: Commencing July 1, 2008, you must be a Registered Reader to access New York Public Personnel Law NOTICE Effective July 1, 2008, you must be a Registered Reader to access New York Public Personnel Law either directly or via a "feed" The quarterly index of topics covered and cases summarized since April 1, 2008 is set out below. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm
The Government House Leader has cited parliamentary procedure[12] to explain this first Standing Order, The convention does not apply to legislation or to the legislative process as the right of Parliament to legislate may not be limited. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 8:44 pm
Public Health, 71 (3): 266-69 (Mar. 1981). [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:01 am
It does not, however, apply to trusts established by will. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
However, data exclusivity only protects clinical trial data which does not prevent another competitor from conducting their own trials (at no risk of failure), which may be likely if there is a lucrative market. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
The tenants (Patels) were solely responsible for(1) maintenance and repairs; (2) insurance; (3) utilities; and (4) taxes. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am
“Since an attorney-client relationship does not depend on the existence of a formal retainer agreement or upon payment of a fee, a court must look to the words and actions of the parties to ascertain the existence of such a relationship” (Nelson v Kalathara, 48 AD3d 528, 529 [2d Dept 2008] [citation omitted]; see also Matter of Priest v Hennessy, 51 NY2d 62, 71 [1980] [payment of fee by third party does not create attorney-client relationship between attorney… [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:31 am
Importantly, your manufacturing contracts should provide cover for you if your factory does not deliver on time. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:35 am
Reviewing the results, I have a few observations: 1. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:34 am
Thirdly, as the Court admitted (para 33), the Italian court in considering whether to give effect to an arbitration agreement between the parties is not applying a rule in the Brussels I Regulation but, instead, is applying the rules contained in the New York Convention, as a convention which (to the extent that its effect is not excluded from scope by Art 1(2)(d)) takes priority over the Regulation's rules by virtue of Art 71(1) of the Regulation. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:38 am
A source does exist. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
Before this judgment, the position was that the tort was clearly recognised only by the Courts of New Zealand have recognised such a tort (see, in particular, Hosking v Runting [2005] 1 NZLR 1). [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
” Doe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:04 am
It prevents the solicitation of another employers’ employees, but does not prevent their hire, so long as there was no solicitation. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:37 pm
It prevents the solicitation of another employers’ employees, but does not prevent their hire, so long as there was no solicitation. [read post]
