Search for: "Douglas v. Douglas"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 4,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2012, 12:26 pm
So she was very interested to hear that Recorder Douglas Campbell, sitting in the Patents County Court, England and Wales, had given judgment in a moral rights case on 18 May 2012 in Emma Delves-Broughton v House of Harlot. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:43 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:09 am
" US v Sergio Martinez - Federal Criminal Indictment 18 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
" US v Phillip Shaw, et al. - Federal Criminal Complaint 21 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm
Feldman argues that Black, the liberal originalist; Douglas, the activist libertarian; Frankfurter, the advocate of strenuous judicial deference; and Jackson, the pragmatist; achieved greatness by developing four unique constitutional approaches, which reflected their own personalities and worldviews, although they were able to converge on common ground in Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:09 am
" US v Sergio Martinez - Federal Criminal Indictment 18 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
" US v Phillip Shaw, et al. - Federal Criminal Complaint 21 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
§ 15.26 Several Liability as a General Rule The Case: McIntyre v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:56 am
Tugendhat J also referred to Douglas v Hello [2005] EWCA Civ 595 and Imerman v Tchenguiz [2011] Fam 116 as other cases where the tort of misuse of private information had been mentioned. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 9:51 am
About the Author: Douglas C. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 1:38 pm
Velazquez-Garcia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:48 am
Saying Baltimore had the right idea, Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 9:30 pm
" Justice Douglas concluded: In this case...it was important that the defendant be able to disclose why it had adopted a particular accounting treatment of its potential exposure to the plaintiff. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:17 am
Two weeks ago I wrote about the folks at Drug and Device Law getting a lot of press as a result of Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 11:22 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:32 am
The case is US v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:38 pm
According to Icon, the invention disclosed and claimed in the application was actually devised by Icon General Manager Royston Douglas Bull (‘Bull’), had been misappropriated by Scott, and wrongfully made the subject of the application in Scott’s name. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:14 pm
No answers to questions by Eric and Deborah, but more questions about Munaf: There's something curious about the United States' position in Munaf v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 5:47 am
” United States v. [read post]
