Search for: "E v. G"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 5,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
(g) Availability of commodities. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 9:08 am
Contents include:Carolina Moehlecke, The Chilling Effect of International Investment Disputes: Limited Challenges to State Sovereignty Anastassia V Obydenkova & Vinícius G Rodrigues Vieira, The Limits of Collective Financial Statecraft: Regional Development Banks and Voting Alignment with the United States at the United Nations General Assembly Lauge N Skovgaard Poulsen, Beyond Credible Commitments: (Investment) Treaties as Focal Points Celeste Beesley, Foreign Policy… [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:57 am
Shadi.com v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm
"a significant risk of substantial harm to the . . . safety of the employee or others" (9 NYCRR 466.11[g][2][I]; Executive Law §§ 292[21-e], 296[3][a]; Pimentel v Citibank, N.A., 29 AD3d 141, 145 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 707 [2006]). [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
You can reach him by e-mail at fschauer at law.virginia.edu[1] SeeNorton, pp. 60-67, and especially the contrast between Pickering v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
CMS can revoke the Medicare billing privileges if a provider or supplier: Failed to comply with its reporting requirements under 42 CFR § 516(d), such as changes in ownership or control, any other changes in enrollment within 90 days, any revocation or suspension of a Federal or State license within 30 days; OR Failed to comply with its reporting requirements under 42 CFR § 33(g)(2), such as changes in ownership, changes of location, changes in general supervision, and… [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
Under 42 CFR Sec. 424.535(a) (9), can revoke the Medicare billing privileges if a provider or supplier: Failed to comply with its reporting requirements under 42 CFR Se. 516(d), such as changes in ownership or control, any other changes in enrollment within 90 days, any revocation or suspension of a Federal or State license within 30 days; OR Failed to comply with its reporting requirements under 42 CFR Sec. 33(g)(2), such as changes in ownership, changes of location, changes in… [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
Cir. 2015) (single page website offering more information about services not yet provided does not meet the use in commerce requirement); Aycock Eng’g, Inc. .v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:52 pm
” David G. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:35 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Joseph G. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:03 am
View Eng’g, Inc., 249 F.3d 1307, 1310 (Fed. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 8:23 am
The court also said that Yelp lacked the requisite intent to deceive: This is not a simple case of false advertising where, for example, a statement is made about a product (e. g., it cures diabetes) that was false, and the maker of the statement knew it was false or had reasonable grounds to believe it was false because the product contained no ingredients that would cure diabetes. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
La loi interdit notamment la discrimination basée sur l’appartenance perçue à un groupe protégé. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 10:14 am
Anisman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:34 pm
Hardware Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:10 am
Socha, G. and Gelbmann, T. (2005). [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
v. [read post]
