Search for: "Files v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 1361 - 1380 of 3,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
 Along with this action, the plaintiff also filed a separate case against the United States of America pursuant to the Federal Torts Claim Act in which he signed a sworn FTCA Notice of Claim dated October 5, 2006. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:54 am
Trademark Office issued the following 121 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in February 2014 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Reg. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 5:31 am by Josh Blackman
[The primary effect, if not purpose, of international law, is to use lawfare to punish Israel, and by extension, the United States.] [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 5:27 pm
Anthem Health Plans (08-15268), the Eleventh Circuit held that the Butero test was modified by the United States Supreme Court in Aetna Health Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by Terry Hart
“Without this legislation, the existence of the broadcast news monitoring industry in the United States is and will remain in jeopardy. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 8:08 am by Stephanie Ellis
(PDS) came along and filed a protest on the basis that Superior was controlled by, and shared resources with, Essilor of America, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:36 am by Law Lady
SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., a Florida Corporation, ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICA, INC., a foreign profit corporation, IAE INTERNATIONAL AERO ENGINES AG, a foreign profit entity, PRATT & WHITNEY, a division of UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, a foreign profit corporation, Appellees. 4th District. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-5758, involving the “stacking” of mandatory minimum firearm sentences prosecuted together. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
They could not remove speech glorifying terrorist attacks against the United States—unless they also remove speech decrying, memorializing, or educating about terrorist attacks against the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Hughes v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Amgen then filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-7793 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]