Search for: "German v. German"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 5,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Super Mario company paved the way for BMW and Daimler's invalidity defense against a Broadcom patent
7 Dec 2019, 7:30 am
Last year, however, Broadcom forced the Volkswagen group into a billion-dollar settlement, exploiting the sad state of affairs of German patent law, where injunctions are granted--mnst of the time over patents that would later be held invalid--without an eBay v. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 6:15 am
I'm convinced a more eBay v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:16 am
In the first Nokia v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
German furniture co. called Vitra, which has registered and litigated over a lot of IP; people go to jail in Europe regularly for trafficking in midcentury modern American furniture, where there are limited/no (what he calls bullshit) US rights. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
If courts take conceptual separability seriously, it becomes the German test in disguise—but even the German court has now abandoned a test of superior creativity, so there’s only one test of originality in German law, which doesn’t require superior creativity. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:25 am
Background to the case Balema is a German producer of balsamic vinegar and markets its products as "Balsamico" or "Deutscher Balsamico". [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:11 pm
Last week, Advocate General (AG) Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered an important Opinion in Coty Germany v Amazon, C-567/18 [not yet available in English]. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:56 pm
Currently two proceedings involving SEPs and FRAND issues are already pending before the Bundesgerichtshof, both of them appeals against judgments of the OLG Duesseldorf (Unwired Planet v Huawei, and Sisvel v Haier), so that the German Bundesgerichtshof may have a chance clarify some of the open questions on FRAND soon. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
At the time--and even until I downloaded the above document--I had no idea he was going to make a filing in FTC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:25 am
| Another "Glen", another GI violation- Hamburg Court considers "Glen Els" an Evocation of "Scotch Whisky" | Around the IP Blogs | BREAKING: German constitutional court Brexit-delay rumours are "bulls***" in on-going UPC saga | "Many are called but few are chosen": When a claim of bad faith succeeded in a trademark matter in Singapore | [Guest Post] IP Education Series #3 | FRAND: OLG Karlsruhe rules on nature, extent and timing of… [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:08 am
Either one wants to argue that indirectly-imposed costs count, or one doesn't.Expect more posts on FTC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 6:01 am
These goals are rarely achieved with a three-V approach to dispute resolution. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 10:41 am
FTC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:12 pm
Since our client resided in Chicago, IL, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:53 am
The issue has come up repeatedly before German courts and the German Bundesgerichtshof has assessed it within the safe harbour framework of the E-commerce directive [e.g. here, at 31]. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
I hope the following links, excerpts, comments, and reflections (in no particular order) will prove of interest for one reason or another to our readers. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:53 am
Otherwise, companies would be reluctant to give up their right to enter into individual license agreements for various reasons, one of which is the ability to enter into full-portfolio cross-license agreements.Avanci generally calls itself a platform, but on LinkedIn, Eric Stasik was surprised to see that even Avanci's lawyers, in the Continental v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
The DOJ intervened in the recent FTC v Qualcomm case (in which Judge Koh found in favour of the FTC) and now on appeal. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 2:20 am
The pursuit of an injunction while failing to comply with a duty will, as a rule, constitute abuse (unless the implementer is being non-compliant).On timing, the German decision is largely in line with the UK courts – there, the CoA held that its approach on timing was indeed consistent with the flexible approach taken earlier by the German courts. [read post]
