Search for: "Grant v. District of Columbia" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,551
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am by Lyle Denniston
In the 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
But on appeal, a divided panel of the Eleventh Circuit granted relief. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
28 May 2015, 11:11 am by James Jensen
Finally, there is a lawsuit currently pending in the District of Columbia federal district court (Save Jobs USA v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am by Maureen Johnston
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:27 am by Ronald Mann
Still, he went on to offer a lengthy formalistic analysis that would limit any activity by non-Article III courts to matters involving the territories (like the District of Columbia), the armed forces, or “public rights. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia partially granted a request for a preliminary injunction against the enforcement on new Interior Department rules which are intended, under the Department's reading of the Lacey Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals excluded the evidence, because the test had not gained general acceptance among the authorities in the fields of physiology and psychology. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:33 am by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, refusing rehearing en banc of the case known as the Priests for Life dispute, rejecting the claims of several religious entities. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Our lone grant has, much like its namesake, started from the bottom and earned a place at the table through persistence. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
City and County of San Francisco 14-704 Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia’s invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:11 am by Ruthann Robson
Lemke, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the grant of a summary judgment in favor of law... [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:24 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 2004) (determining that, `[r]egardless whether he received the e-mail notice,’ the plaintiffs' attorney, `remained obligated to monitor the court's docket’).Aghdasi v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-280, which the Court granted to resolve that question. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:56 am by John Jascob
The disparity between redeeming and non-redeeming shareholders would produce an “unfair and inequitable result” among Copley’s shareholders, the SEC said, which is contrary one of the Investment Company Act's primary purposes.Copley appealed to the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia under the Administrative Procedure Act, arguing that the SEC's denial of its request was arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am by Maureen Johnston
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]