Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 3:10 am
48 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 3 from 2012: Copy of order in Council. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:25 am
The judge then cited a helpful passage from Carnwath LJ in R(Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government: 32. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
Topics will include: Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program Chemicals regulation (possible TSCA reform and California's Green Chemistry) New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Renewable energy incentive programs Offshore wind power generation CERCLA: Fallout from Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm
(California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:30 am
Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
KHAN v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:14 pm
Brief History of the LCFS The purpose of LCFS is to "reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing the full fuel-cycle, carbon intensity of the transportation fuel used in California. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
On the issue of greenhouse gas impacts, the court found that the city properly exercised its discretion to use AB 32 compliance as the threshold when the Air Quality Assessment showed the emission reduction program would reduce the project’s emissions by 29 percent. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm
And at Cato@Liberty, Ilya Shapiro previews the issues in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:28 am
Air Transport Association of America v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (International Air Transport Association and others, intervening); (Case C-366/10); [2011] WLR (D) 386 “Certain principles and provisions of international law could be relied upon to assess the validity of Parliament and Council Directive 2008/101/EC amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:15 pm
Of course, the column touches on Bush v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:50 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:13 am
R (CLIENTEARTH) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT FOOD & RURAL AFFAIRS (2011), QBD (Admin) Mitting J, 13 December 2011, extempore so transcript not available. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 3:17 pm
However, the rulemaking was stayed as a result of Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:42 pm
" Mukasey and Gonzales echo the concerns of several other commentators, who have expressed particular alarm over Gingrich’s attack on the landmark decision Cooper v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Categorical Exemptions SB 226 amends CEQA to provide that a project's greenhouse gas emissions cannot alone make a categorical exemption from CEQA inapplicable, so long as the project complies with applicable regulations and requirements relating to greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
(City of Long Beach v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:00 pm
Instead, it was the Congress of the 1970s that wrote a broad statute – and the Supreme Court of 2006 that interpreted that statute to (more or less) require EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles (Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm
A consortium of environmental groups including the Sierra Club (Environmental Petitioners) filed their own petition, arguing that EPA abused its discretion by declining to include greenhouse gas emissions standards in its NSPS rule. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm
A consortium of environmental groups including the Sierra Club (Environmental Petitioners) filed their own petition, arguing that EPA abused its discretion by declining to include greenhouse gas emissions standards in its NSPS rule. [read post]
