Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:48 am
ZS v DP on issue of mens rea in unlawful carnal knowledge. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
The Fab Five are Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lady Hale of Richmond, Lord Mance of Frognal and Lord Collins of Mapesbury, of whom one (Lord Walker) has served time on the Patents Court and another (Lord Collins) has presided over a pretty robust bit of patent litigation himself. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
E, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Islington [2017] EWHC 1440 (Admin) E is a nine year old child, who brought the claim through her mother, C. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 2:14 pm
See Cintas Corp. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:01 am
Post-Harvest, Inc. v Mirtech, Inc., C.A. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
Giving the leading judgment, Lord Kerr (with whom Lady Hale, Lord Hodge and Lady Black agreed) allowed the appeal on the basis that there had been a breach of the investigative obligation under ECHR, art 2. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
Lady Hale gave the leading judgment and she argued that s 177(1) now extends to harmful or abusive action at large. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:31 pm
From O'Handley v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
In the seventeenth century, Matthew Hale, a famous English jurist, in support of his argument for the presumption of innocence cites a Latin maxim … It is better five guilty persons should escape unpunished, than one innocent person should die.7 Nor does the United States Supreme Court agree that “beyond a reasonable doubt” is incapable of being defined.8 Quite the contrary, according to Justice Ginsburg, concurring in the full opinion of the court, [E]ven if definitions… [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Federal Judge Shifts eDiscovery Cost in Potential Class Action - http://bit.ly/PBEZGU (Saranac Hale Spencer) Predictive Coding v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 9:15 am
For more see Looking Ahead to TiVo v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
In R(M) v Newham LBC (2020) EWHC 327 (Admin), these were the apparently vexed, but important, questions for Linden J, in circumstances which the evidence suggested were pretty awful (and I wonder if Newham might reflect that this was a poor case to run, even though the question of law requires authoritative judgment). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
In R(M) v Newham LBC (2020) EWHC 327 (Admin), these were the apparently vexed, but important, questions for Linden J, in circumstances which the evidence suggested were pretty awful (and I wonder if Newham might reflect that this was a poor case to run, even though the question of law requires authoritative judgment). [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:29 am
In Hanson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 10:12 am
Perry, from 1974, and Menna v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 8:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 2:37 pm
In the words of Lord Hale: "Regularly a man cannot commit felony of the goods, wherein he hath a property. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
This consternation is expressed in the first paragraph of the Supreme Court’s judgment in this case, given by Lady Hale and Lord Wilson, and most of the following paragraphs are given over to diluting the effect of the Grand Chamber’s decision. [read post]
