Search for: "Harper v. Harper"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Harper & James, in their tort treatise, said much the same thing: "conformity to the legislative standard. . .may so clearly constitute due care under the circumstances of any given case that the court will decide it does as a matter of law. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
An extract explaining the project’s origin appeared in Harper’s Magazine here. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
The courts have stressed that, to give proper protection for responsible journalism, the defence must be applied in a practical and workable manner: Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300 PC; Harper v Seaga [2009] 1 AC 1 PC. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Harper (San Antonio, TX)MGM v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
IPSO 20762-23 Dale v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 22502-23 Complainant v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO meditation Resolution Statement – 00041-24 A man v Mail Online, 6 Children (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Statements in open court and apologies On 20 February 2024, there was a statement in open court in the case of Tayler… [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 7:44 pm
Harper (2022) - Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch would have blocked a state supreme court's finding of a partisan gerrymander. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
`Michael' Pruneda, Jr., Rolando Quintana, for Elmer DeGuzman, Yolanda Lopez, Richard Wecker and Sheryl Hamer, Respondents.Alfred John Harper, III, Arrissa K. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
This can be a heavy burden, particularly where the charge is a grave one, but requiring defendants to prove truth is not incompatible with Article 10: see McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22; Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:26 pm
" Harper v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
One way to make this assessment is to look at the use “from the point of view of the reasonable copyright owner,” which is the approach the Supreme Court identified in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
Civil Liberties website: Writing in McCreary County, Kentucky v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:27 pm
Circuit in Comcast v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:12 am
"] From B.B. v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
One way to make this assessment is to look at the use “from the point of view of the reasonable copyright owner,” which is the approach the Supreme Court identified in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
One way to make this assessment is to look at the use “from the point of view of the reasonable copyright owner,” which is the approach the Supreme Court identified in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:01 am
Harper, Ph.D.. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
While in most cases it will be a media defendant who wishes to rely on the defence, there is Privy Council authority to the effect that the privilege can be asserted by a non-media defendant (Seaga v Harper [2008] UKPC 9). [read post]
