Search for: "Holmes v. Holmes"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
In 2014, Courtney Love was found not liable for defamation against Holmes. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
The Court directed the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action in Jilek v Stockson, Solomon v Blue Water Village East LLC, and LaMeau v City of Royal Oak. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
(Correction: Thanks to a colleague for advising that the fire-shouting phrase started in the following majority opinion by Justice Holmes: Schenk v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:13 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:36 am
” The purpose of the 2011 amendment was to abrogate the Supreme Court’s 2002 decision in Holmes Group v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
As Oliver Wendell Holmes said, “the life of the law has not been logic: it has been experience. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 9:25 am
An important decision, Serco, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
Tigner v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:56 am
Purchasing Power Sony Network Data Breach Class Action Suffers Setback — In re Sony Gaming Networks Court Dismisses Data Breach Claims Against Countrywide – Holmes v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
V. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a… [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Opinion below (11th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amici curiae of Public Good and the Center for Constitutional Rights Docket: 08-1358 Title: Holmes v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:40 am
In this panel, a group of attorneys will discuss the impact of several cases that EFF has been tracking closely, including Tarantino v Gawker, the battle over whether Sherlock Holmes is in the public domain, and an appellate court’s decision to force YouTube to remove “The Innocence of Muslims. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:32 am
Stewart v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
It is an act for which he or she is accountable under the Constitution: As Justice Holmes stated almost a century ago in Biddle v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm
With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:50 am
Indyne, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:48 am
It dives into the history of the 1909 Copyright Act and the resulting Herbert v Shanley Co. [read post]
