Search for: "Hughes v. State"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2012, 6:04 am
In it, he states: Now, let’s move right onto our next legal target and source of lots of billable hours. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
” And even as far back as Gibbons v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:00 am
Hughes was also noted "for her speedy and impartial administration of justice" -- and for cases like Roe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:39 am
First, a unanimous court in the song previews reset the law with an emphasis once again on balance and user rights: In Theberge v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:24 am
On the transfer of liability question, Hughes LJ rejected the managers’ argument that the in order to “subsist” for the purpose of the Secretary of State’s Order that the potential liability must have been “known” by the managers at the time of the Order. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:06 am
The reference, of course, was to Chief Justice Hughes who presided over the United States Supreme Court from 1930 to 1941. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
United States: According to UPI, a libel insurance issue has derailed the pending release of a documentary entitled “Unlawful Killing” about a supposed coverup of the death of Princess Diana. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
Israel: State Prosecutor Moshe Lador has apologized to former prime minister Ehud Olmert in a libel action which Olmert had issued against him. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 6:37 pm
United States (The Treasury Bond Gold Clause case), Chief Justice Hughes was very concerned about admitting that the United States could devalue its sovereign obligations. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm
However, the court afforded plaintiff an opportunity to amend her complaint to see if she could state a parallel state law claim of the type found not preempted by Hughes v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:19 am
United States; a very slippery opinion by Chief Justice Hughes.1935-1936: The Court invalidates many other New Deal statutes1936: FDR is reelected overwhelmingly and the Democrats rule the roost for decades.Some generations played out a little differently. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
United States) harkened back to Chief Justice Marshall's approach in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
The only one of the impressive range of speeches was that given by Hugh Grant – where he called on European Union regulators to restrict the influence of media moguls such as Rupert Murdoch. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
”1 Aside from the granular problems stated above, and recognizing that the proposed amendments would in fact add to the problem astutely noted in the quote above by Lawrence Lessig, there is a global, more systemic conflict at issue within the realm of copyright enforcement litigation deserving mention. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
Filburn (1942) and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Here, said the court, in a case concerning an employee's bumping rights under the Civil Service Law, Matter of Hughes v Doherty, 5 NY3d 100, the Court of Appeals ruled that "judicial review of [the Commission's] classification system and determinations are limited to whether there was a rational basis for the agency's conclusion.... [read post]
