Search for: "IN RE CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm by Ken White
He was there because Prenda Law is now running for the exits, seeking to dismiss AF Holdings' case against defendant Joe Navasca "without prejudice" — meaning, with the option to re-file. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
At base, defendants’ attacks on plaintiffs’ experts present common questions that cannot be resolved at this juncture and do not preclude certification. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:24 am by Giles Peaker
The re-review in April 2023 upheld the decision that the property as suitable. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am by Unknown
Wagner’s question, Doug Ellenoff, a partner at Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP, replied that there is a “troubling coordinated narrative we’re hearing. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
Typically, the burden of proof on that question (versus the specific causation question) is much lighter for plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:24 pm by Mary Bruce
Comparatively, some states might have shorter practical tests or fewer questions on their written exams, but Alabama’s approach aims to produce well-rounded, safety-conscious riders. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:35 pm by Stacie Rosenzweig
Now, as with many endeavors, whether you can and whether you should may be different questions. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:31 am by Kaitlin Schoberl
“The litigation seeks certification on behalf of a class of persons in the United States who, from March 22, 2020, through the present, used a listing broker in the sale of a pre-owned boat or yacht listed on a MLS, and who paid a commission to the buyer’s broker in connection with the sale. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 1:38 pm by Joseph A. McNelis III
Regulations do not preempt state or tribe laws and allow each jurisdiction to apply more restrictive regulations than the USDA. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: False advertising context: FTC/state AGs. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
” In MedImmune, the Court re-affirmed the correct standard for determining a justiciable declaratory judgment action: “Basically, the question in each case is whether the facts alleged, under all the circumstances, show that there is a substantial controversy, between the parties having adverse legal interests, of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a declaratory judgment. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
One frequently asked question is whether members of a corporate board’s audit committee face heightened liability exposures. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:43 am by Jennifer P. Smith
The outcome of the case concerning the acceptable methodology for calculating municipal affordable housing obligations will certainly have an impact on the future of affordable housing laws in the State and on developers' ultimate contributions. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm by David Walk
Id. at *10-14.What makes this holding especially interesting is that the prior state court decisions did not involve the typical pure question of law – e.g., does Pennsylvania law recognize medical monitoring – but a question of law with a heavy factual component – “whether, under Pennsylvania law, a person exposed to beryllium above background levels, absent sensitization, can be at a ‘significantly… [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am by John Elwood
  (The one released hold of which we’re aware, Cano v. [read post]