Search for: "In Re CAL" Results 1361 - 1380 of 5,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The Sutter County Fire Department, Yuba City Fire Department, Cal Fire and Marysville Fire Department all responded and closed nearby streets downtown. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 1:04 pm
You're not likely to get an appreciative audience, particularly in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
  Despite the fact they're hung on the second victim, the jury says "True" on the enhancement. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:02 pm
But when you're the California Supreme Court, on an issue of California law, you're the boss. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:48 pm
Everything in your life doesn't revolve around advancing your gang just because you're in one. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
And if you're fancy, "arson of an inhabited structure or property. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:22 pm
Fulton isn't likely to appreciate.Something to think about the next time you're thinking about filing one of these appeals. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:56 am
 So pissed that they're going to go out of their way to slam the federal court that reversed them. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 1:45 pm
  But I don't think they're entirely independent. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
  It's market capitalization is multiple billions of dollars.Given those facts, it's simply absurd -- bordering on the frivolous, even -- to say that a jury can't spank you for several million on the grounds that you're poor.But in my view, one simple fact alone is sufficient refutation of defendant's claims. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
  Certiorari stage documents: Opinion below (Cal. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 11:30 am by Anthony Zaller
  There is no indication, and Los Angeles County Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer told the LA Times recently, “We’re not lobbying to extend the emergencies. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:12 am
 They provide not only color, but they're relevant to the legal claims at issue in the appeal.So I'm not critiquing their inclusion.But the thing is:  the opinion uses the victim's real name. [read post]