Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 1361 - 1380 of 18,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Within 72 hours of his re-admission the patient should be provided with a written explanation of the reasons for his recall. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:34 am
Both said that these re-entry programs are the best tool we have to reduce recidivism, and that they appear to be working. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:56 am by Kedar
They’reJustice Alito: Maybe — maybe your perspective has changed too, Mr. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 4:23 pm
Moreover, I have no doubt whatsoever that Justice Butz and the rest of the panel gave a great deal of thought to the issue, and that their constitutional views are well within the realm of the possible.But I still think they're wrong. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 8:53 am
  'Cause I read the thing and know you're supposed to. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:40 pm
Justice Handrigan of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador Trial Division (General), in Rowsell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 3:30 am by Lyrissa B. Lidsky
Lidsky In the past few years, a number of prominent voices—including then-candidate Donald Trump, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Neil Gorsuch, federal appeals court judge Lawrence Silberman, top Democratic election lawyer Marc Elias, and others—have called for the Supreme Court to reconsider its constitutionalization of defamation law that began with New York Times v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 1:57 pm
"This book is a must read and re-read for anyone who practices in the criminal justice system as it lays bare the ugly practical consequences of misdemeanor arrests and convictions. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 2:49 am
It fought hard to re-earn the legitimacy it had lost in ADM, Jabalpur. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:22 pm by Bill Otis
Thus, they're just waiting for the most apt vehicle  --  as lawyers say  --  to overturn it. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:40 am by MBettman
That means any tie votes would uphold the appellate decision below, or such a case could be re-argued. [read post]