Search for: "In re I.S." Results 1361 - 1380 of 13,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2020, 4:51 am by dhdlaw
This coverage could help even if you’re not in your car. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 7:20 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-921Issue: Whether the minimum required culpability state for denying a bankruptcy debtor a discharge of a tax debt based on the debtor's participation in a disallowed tax shelter, and spending decisions in light of a known or potential tax debt is: (1) negligence (i.e., the debtor should have known better than to participate in the tax shelter or spend money on something other than a present or potential future tax bill), per the analysis of several circuits including… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:03 pm by SOIssues
The main variables of concern include: (1) recidivism levels, (2) days to first re-arrest, and (3) level of harm (i.e., number of sex offenses, violent offenses, and number of child victims). [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:14 pm
We know you and yours can't or won't follow any of them--i.e., you're a lawyer, think you are "special", and believe you're entitled to a standard that would embarrass a drunken bellhop--but you can at least try. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:43 am by velvel
July 8, 2009Re: The Vast Amount That We Don’t Know About The Madoff Matter. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
Quoting the Court’s earlier decision,In re Cuozzo, the majority reiterated that IPRs are “a second look at an earlier administrative” action, i.e., grant of a patent. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 8:38 am
"Indeed, Snow claimed that DOJ made the removals (i.e., asked for "resignations") without even telling the President! [read post]
15 May 2020, 8:21 am by dhdlaw
When that time comes, imagine that you’re picking up your in-laws from the airport. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:06 am by Zachary Spilman
[W]e’re going to have to craft a findings worksheet and findings instructions that will make it clear to the members that they must—if they convict him of anything, they must select one and identify which one that is. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
However, the reason given [by the self-recusing members], i.e. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:01 pm
District Judge Jed Rakoff's scathing refusal earlier in the week to approve the proposed $33 million "settlement" (i.e., sweep under the rug) between the SEC and Bank of America over that the Bank's failure (at least transparently) to disclose to its shareholders the billions in bonuses that the Bank agreed that an insolvent Merrill Lynch was allowed to pay to its employees. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
The retailers sought to rely on a number of provisions of the Trade Mark Directive to argue that Adidas' trade marks were either invalid or did not prevent the usage on clothes by others of types of stripes except for three stripes (i.e. two stripes good, three stripes bad!) [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:29 am by Brian Hauss
Because these laws pose an imminent threat to core First Amendment freedoms, we’re asking the federal court hearing our case to block them as soon as possible. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:43 pm by David Oscar Markus
The Supreme Court decided to hear a case involving the Stolen Valor Act; i.e., whether it is a crime to lie about prior military service:The court said Monday it will rule on the constitutionality of a law that makes it a federal crime for people to claim falsely, either in writing or aloud, that they have been awarded the Medal of Honor, a Silver Star, Purple Heart or any other military medal.The Stolen Valor Act, which passed Congress with overwhelming support in 2006, apparently has been… [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
In other words, when a hashtag is merely used to reference or organise keywords or topics of information to facilitate searching a topic, i.e. not as a trade mark (see In re Safariland Hunting Corp.) [read post]