Search for: "Jacobs v. State" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Carter **Jennifer Lipinski is a law student at Michigan State University. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Carter **Jennifer Lipinski is a law student at Michigan State University. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Officer Hanks stated that he had attempted an evasive maneuver when he saw the other vehicle driven by Ms. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Next week’s topics will be: Florence v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Knight (EPLAW) (IPKat) INTA special reports: Sir Robin Jacob’s speech; a century of trade mark law; damages in Europe (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform What Congress should do to fix the patent system, step 1 (Patenthink) Patent Reform Update: Summer debate ahead for America Invents Act (Patent Law Practice Center) How Article One relates to patent quality and reform (Patent Quality Matters) US Patents USPTO expands first action interview pilot program… [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am by Peter J. Sluka
Sigalit v Kahlon Last week, in Sigalit v Kahlon, 21-cv-08921 (SDNY Aug. 30, 2023) United States District Judge Analisa Torres granted the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on an accounting claim. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
In patent academic circles, this has sometimes been referred to as the “Angora Cat” approach as noted by Lord Justice Jacob in European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 192, where he said, at paragraph 5 of the report: Professor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]