Search for: "K. B. R." Results 1361 - 1380 of 5,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2023, 7:00 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Mit einer künftigen schweizerischen E-ID könnte die Alterskontrolle auf den Status «volljährig» beschränkt werden. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:02 pm by Dan Flynn
District Court for Northern Iowa of 73-year-old Cedar Rapids businessman William B. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 2:05 pm by Jeffrey Greyber
Notifies us of any change in ownership, occupancy or substantial change in risk of which the mortgagee is aware; b. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:59 pm
N Cumhuriyet tarihinin en büyük borç yap? [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:42 pm
er veya ceza bütün neticeleriyle beraber ortadan kalkar. [read post]
30 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In exceptional circumstances the appellant may of course decide to withdraw the appeal without filing a statement of grounds of appeal and before the time limit for doing so has expired, thus qualifying for the reimbursement of the appeal fee under R 103(1)(b). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:56 am by David Vasella
Das BGer bestätigt, dass nur vorsätzliche bzw. böswillige und jedenfalls treuwidrige Irreführungen zur Haftung führen können: […] la responsabilité suppose un comportement contraire aux moeurs, intentionnel ou dû à une négligence grave, au sens de l'art. 41 CO. [read post]
9 May 2013, 7:40 am by D. Daxton White
  The SEC further alleged that True North engaged in transactions, acts, practices or courses of business which constitute violations of 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B), and 15(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Sometimes the Boards indicated that R 65(2) EPC 1973 was preferred to R 88 EPC 1973 as it was more specific (T 715/01 [9]); (b) decisions in which R 88 EPC 1973 was used as a legal basis for the corrections (T 814/98); (c) decisions in which correction was refused because the notice of appeal contained no remediable errors but rather a mistake of law. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
R 99(2) provides that “In the statement of grounds of appeal the appellants shall indicate the reasons for setting aside the decision impugned, or the extent to which it is to be amended and the facts and evidence on which the appeal is based”.R 101(1) provides that “If the appeal does not comply with A 106 to A 108, R 97 or R 99, paragraph 1(b) or (c) or paragraph 2, the Board of Appeal shall reject it as… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Since the board considered that the interpretation of the process exclusion contained in A 53(b) needed clarification in the light of R 26(5), it referred corresponding questions to the EBA. [20] In view of the responses given by the EBA in G 1/08, [the patent proprietor] deleted the process claims so that the claim requests now on file are restricted to product claims directed to tomato fruits or tomato fruit products […]. [read post]