Search for: "KERR v. STATE" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith v… [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
” United States The creators of the Netflix series “When They See Us” are being sued for defamation. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Turley v Unite the Union, heard 11 to 15 and 19 November 2019 (Nicklin J) Kirkegaard v Smith, heard 26 November 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has also ruled that a rape victim can sue the State over disclosure of her address to her attacker. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Chief Constable of Kent v McLoughlin, KA-2023-000118. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am by INFORRM
” The ECtHR stated that Article 8 did not apply, as “the underlying reasons for the applicant’s dismissal from work were sufficiently linked to his private life. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:12 pm
See Thoughts on United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:21 am by <ADMINNICENAME>
Here’s a link to the case mentioned earlier, Painter v. [read post]