Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 15,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 1:02 pm
It is not disputed that he correctly stated the applicable law: [255] In Garcia v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:53 pm
Well settled law ignored according to the Court of Appeal of Ontario. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm
Forum non conveniens The Claimant relied on EU case law (Owusu v Jackson (C-281/2002) and Maletic v lastminute.com GmbH (C-478-12)) to argue that the court was precluded from considering forum non conveniens issues. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Dorn v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
In this context, it is important to explore the principles underlying the norm of limited injunctive relief, and how these might be applied to online activity that crosses national borders. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:54 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 2:27 am
The Seattle Times yesterday reported on the July 11 oral argument in the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment in Experience Hendrix, LLC, v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:27 am
The issue was address in a Virginia case, Grant v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
November 6, 2018 In a recent decision handed down by the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, in Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:22 am
Last June, the Supreme Court ruled in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
In Lucas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
There was discovery and then the Plaintiff moved for summary judgment and Defendants cross moved seeking either dismissal or summary judgment in their favor. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
There was discovery and then the Plaintiff moved for summary judgment and Defendants cross moved seeking either dismissal or summary judgment in their favor. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:09 am
Well, not according to the recent opinion of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Guam in Guam v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:41 am
Facts: This case (Ricky Shew and Frances Shew v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
See Wright v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
The key legal questions facing Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr are likely to concern the interpretation of: (1) The Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; (2) UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency; and (3) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:29 pm
In the case of Gioia v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 7:25 am
In the present preliminary case a cross-border injunction was ordered by the provisions judge. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:24 am
” “These rights” (one Panel noted) “derive from national laws and do not exist divorced from such laws,” Antonio de Felipe v. [read post]
