Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 7,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
Like its federal counterpart, Michigan Rule of Evidence 804(b)(2) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil action or proceeding, [for] a statement made by a declarant while believing that the... [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 2:59 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 701 provides that If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness' testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the... [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:27 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 701 provides that If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness' testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the... [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) provides that In a criminal case, an expert witness must not state an opinion about whether the defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition that constitutes an element of the crime... [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:26 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:57 pm
Supreme Court, May 04, 2009 Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:46 am
An exception in legal malpractice actions might arise when the documents are very difficult legal writings, that a lay person might not understand, even when read. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
And the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-185/05 Italy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:04 am
In April of last year, a Marshall jury in Judge Ward's court found for the plaintiff in QPSX Development 5 PTY LTD v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am
Link to part 1- http://ukscblog.com/new-judgment-jetivia-sa-anor-v-bilta-uk-ltd-ors-2015-uksc-23-part-1/ [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:02 am
Prigg v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Can., 2016-07-08), 2016 CSC 27, SOQUIJ AZ-51302609, 2016EXP-2173, J.E. 2016-1212 — délai supérieur au plafond présumé — circonstances exceptionnelles — événement distinct — Loi visant principalement la récupération des sommes payées injustement à la suite de fraudes ou de manoeuvres dolosives dans le cadre de contrats publics — complexité de l’affaire — nombre… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Gitxaala Nation v Canada – The Enbridge Cases The Enbridge proposal would have seen diluted bitumen carried by pipeline approximately 1,200 kilometres from northern Alberta to Kitimat BC, across over 1,000 rivers and streams, to a new marine terminal. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
Sackett v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
Sackett v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 5:03 am
U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Hoffer v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:28 pm
CATHY VICE, ET AL. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:00 am
Binion v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
An individual may have an odor of alcohol but not be intoxicated or impaired within the legal definition as held in People v Miller and Mulvean v Fox. [read post]
