Search for: "Little v State" Results 1361 - 1380 of 26,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2018, 1:49 pm
"  That'll indeed establish jurisdiction and move the case along to trial, without the need for you to worry your little head about whether any specific damages request is too low or too high.But if the defendant defaults, all you can get is $25,000. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
Soemtimes I can figure things out on my own, even when they're not expressly stated. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:58 am by George Basharis
Further, the marks were visually dissimilar, and The Row Kitchen and Pub offered very little evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact that the Whiskey Row mark created the likelihood of confusion (The Row, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 2:33 pm
of the opinion:"A variation on this view culminated in Brandenburg v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am by JB
As of today, a federal judge and the President of the United States support the result in Texas v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:48 am
England is trying to catch up with Ohio and the rest of the United States when it comes to Family Law. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 1:11 pm
So you might want to take notice of a little bit of direction in today's Order from the Business Court in Hill v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:26 am by David Bernstein
Ferguson, which gave us the racial doctrine of “separate but equal,” the case of Lochner v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:07 pm
 Judge Clifton begins the thing with a nice little summary:"It is a crime to produce outside the United States a visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct and to then transport that visual depiction into the United States. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 2:36 pm
As Justice Scalia stated plainly in Grutter, in his view, the "Constitution proscribes government discrimination on the basis of race, and state-provided education is no exception. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:12 pm
Fifty years before, Pete Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]