Search for: "London v. State" Results 1361 - 1380 of 4,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2017, 8:46 am by Afro-Corne
 United Kingdom From the recent British case in Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v Technosport London Limited it appears that the vigorous enforcement of BMW trade mark rights is a trend that can also be found in other countries. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 29 June 2017 the Culture Secretary Karen Bradley made a statement to the House of Commons stating that she was “minded” to refer the proposed takeover of Sky plc by 21st Century Fox Inc to the Competition and Markets Authority on plurality grounds. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
The Court stated that the operators of said platform, playing an essential role in making the works available, are to be considered liable of copyright infringement. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
The Court stated that the operators of said platform, playing an essential role in making the works available, are to be considered liable of copyright infringement. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
An authority for this proposition was Bowater v NW London Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] IRLR 331, where Stanley Burnton LJ said: The appellant’s conduct was rightly made the subject of disciplinary action. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:56 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
What enterprising London council is going to snap that one up to house the homeless? [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The Irish State could be facing millions in claims for damages from citizens if public bodies  illegally process their personal information. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm by Giles Peaker
DA & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2017) EWHC 1446 (Admin) This was the judicial review of the ‘reduced’ benefit cap – £20,000 pa  outside London, £23,000 in London, brought by claimants who were all single mothers with children, including children under two years old. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
 Port of London Authority v Paul Mendoza [2017] UKUT 146 (TCC). [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
The CJEU stated that the system of the InfoSoc Directive is one of broad and preventative rights. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Commentary magazine has published the responses they received from a wide variety of writers and broadcasters to the question ‘is free speech under threat in the United States? [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla  Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM  - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) ·         Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law   ·        … [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005]: The Belmarsh CaseRichard Clayton9. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 1:46 am by Emma Boffey, Lorraine Walkinshaw, CMS
Today’s case – Sadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department – concerns interventions to stop alleged ‘sham’ marriages. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog had a post on regulatory developments affecting social media use  in the United States. [read post]