Search for: "MYERS v. STATE"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 8:50 pm
Myers, 2008 U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:19 pm
See Myers v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
"The Circuit Court said "This language cannot be reasonably interpreted to explicitly state that benefits vested as soon as a worker became eligible for a pension or to retire" as the phrase "shall be provided" in the Plan refers to "retired employees," rather than to current employees who might retire in the future.There have been a number of cases addressing the continuation of health insurance coverage upon retirement decided by New York courts.In… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:21 am
While the opinion in Kirton v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
These commentators look to Myers v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:46 pm
State v. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
Norfolk Southern Corporation Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville 09a0047n.06 David Myers v. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
Norfolk Southern Corporation Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville 09a0047n.06 David Myers v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
Myers potentially killed Ms. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Helen deThomas, Senior Policy Analyst, US-VISIT, Department of Homeland Security, 1616 Fort Myer Drive, 18th Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22209, (202) 298-5200. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:42 pm
Myers. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:59 am
Dan Myers, Case No. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 3:51 am
With respect to plaintiff's remaining claims, he has failed to state a cause of action for fraud, and no private right of action exists for perjury, tampering with documents, obstruction of justice, and frivolous pleadings (see [*2]Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:52 am
Myers, et al., 08-235). [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:33 pm
Lopez,514 U.S. at 552-553 (citing Gibbons v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:51 pm
Sanofi-Synthelabo et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
Myers, et al., on Jan. 11 — five months before the Boumediene ruling came down. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:29 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 3:41 am
See Maxwell, 446 F.3d at 1216-17 (finding a market for child pornography and upholding congressional regulation of same); United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
APPELLATE / IP In Coffee Battle (Folgers v. [read post]
