Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 55,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2013, 3:54 pm
On March 27, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Comcast v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:30 am
On April 23, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:56 pm
On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Salinas v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:37 am
Chesapeake v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 2:45 pm
David Weinberger - The TSX today published notice that it is adopting amendments to its Company Manual that would require issuers to (i) elect directors annually; (ii) elect directors individually; (iii) publicly disclose the votes received for the election of each director; (iv) disclose whether a majority voting policy has been adopted and if not, explain the practices for electing directors and the reason for not adopting a majority voting policy; and… [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
See Alaska v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
Cir. 2015) (member of unanimous majority) (affirming child pornography sentence); United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:08 am
Marty’s view Now, this case is not being brought in Australia but, if it were, one would wonder about the trade dress prospects given the clear Samsung branding in light of Parkdale v Puxu and its progeny such as Playcorp v Bodum. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:38 am
He reasoned that the question of proportionality involved controversial issues of social and economic policy, with major implications for public spending. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
First it was 7th Circuit Judge Richard Posner, whose New Republic article challenged the legitimacy of the majority decision in D.C. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 11:22 am
As Tom Goldstein notes there, the only remaining undecided case on the docket from the March argument calendar is DC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:53 pm
An interesting aspect is that the panel majority and the dissent viewthe obviousness inquiry here in entirely different ways, with only the dissent (who would findNONOBVIOUSNESS as to Chapman) citing to KSR v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland, TV Vest v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:11 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which concerns whether a major provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is consistent with the principle of separation of powers; Graham v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 12:20 pm
Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French formed the majority. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:40 am
After all, Justice Scalia was part of a majority that went as far as it could to undermine the integrationist intent of Brown. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:48 pm
In an unexpected rebuke the Supreme Court, two prominent federal appeals court judges are lambasting Justice Scalia's majority opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
