Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 5,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2019, 10:48 am
In other words, the purchasers have to immediately understand upon seeing the mark with the goods or services, that the mark/acronym stands for the underlying phrase, and that it is substantially synonymous for the words it represents. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:59 am
By David C. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:25 am
Mark Udall’s 2015 Marks Lecture, which he will deliver at the James E. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 10:29 pm
By Dale C. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 5:59 pm
15 U.S.C. 1117(b)-(c). [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
- the tricky issue of priority right transfer (T 0725/14) | Everything is awesome: Lego blocks “Lepin” trade mark registration | AG Szpunar advises CJEU to rule that copyright protection in designs simply arises when they are original | Fordham 27 (Report 14): Priority | Fordham 27 (Report 13): PTAB | “AGING BACKWARDS” for fitness-related goods and services? [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 4:03 am
In re Antsy Labs LLC aka Antsy Labs, Serial No. 87157508 (February 5, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Where P’s mark didn’t indicate anything about the goods, no plausible explanation of use of same mark for same goods, so illegitimacy could be presumed. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:31 pm
By Tamara Céline Winegust and Janice Bereskin. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:57 am
Even though Cognac in the registered mark was known as a geographical name among consumers, it doesn’t give a misleading image of the origin of the trade mark’s goods in the context of liqueurs containing cognac. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
Unregistered marks become enforceable as marks under the Lanham Act. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:50 am
Namely, trade mark protection is meant to guarantee the origin of goods and services, while designs protect the appearance of a product. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Getting tough on civil liberties with Bill C-25 In February of this year, our present government enacted Bill C-25. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:10 am
The court noted that infringement under section 34(1)(c) requires the applicant to establish that the use took an unfair advantage of the well-known mark or that the use occasioned substantial harm to the uniqueness and reputation of the well-known mark. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 2:55 am
"A mark proposed for registration on the Supplemental Register must be capable of distinguishing the applicant’s goods or services. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:02 am
In re SnoWizard, Inc., Serial No. 87134847 (December 21, 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Shahar Dilbary has a paper saying we should penalize mark owners for changing goods/services, but that didn’t happen. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:50 am
In May, True Fit sent a C&D alleging that use of TRUEFIT, YOUR TRUE FIT, and other “TRUE-containing marks” was infringing. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:04 am
Ginsburg (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of International and Comparative Trademark Law (Cambridge University Press 2020)Michal Bohaczewski, Special Protection of Trade Marks with a Reputation under European Union Law, (Kluwer 2020) IPKat book review hereThe winner is: Irene Calboli and Jane C. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:04 pm
As such, it is good to know WHEN an expulsion is MANDATORY for a school district. [read post]
