Search for: "Mark Case" Results 1361 - 1380 of 70,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2009, 10:36 am
” Although the Court acknowledged that Section 6(2) of the Canada Trade-marks Act makes it clear that confusion can occur whether or not the wares or services are of the same general class, the Court found: “Even though cosmetics and magazines may be sold in the same stores, the evidence in this case shows that GLAMOUR magazine and Farleyco’s products are sold and advertised in very different ways and are purchased and used in very different ways. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 12:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The district court found that Gravelle’s case for injury causation was frivolous. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:52 pm
In a multi-plaintiff talc trial against Johnson & Johnson, the demonstrative “notes” Mark Lanier wrote to support his questioning powerfully distilled key pieces of testimony and helped win a blockbuster verdict. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:08 am
Whether or not this is the case, however, the underlying fact is that the trade mark practitioner will likely find himself working with the company's CFO or the like with respect to trade mark matters. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Court of Appeals Affirms Trademark Case appeared first on Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:00 am by Doug Austin
Zuckerberg (the case where Paul Ceglia is suing claiming 84% ownership of Facebook due to an alleged agreement he had with Mark Zuckerberg back in 2003), New York Magistrate Judge Leslie G. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 5:07 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
I recently published an article in the Tsinghua China Law Review on Chinese case law in practice, building on several blogposts I had previously written and articles by fellow bloggers Jeremy Daum and Mark Cohen. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:42 pm by Durga Rao Vanayam
In such cases, we can not judge the knowledge and ability of that student just by looking at his marks and attempts to complete the examination. [read post]
Case date: 14 June 2021 Case number: No. 20-2054 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rick Hasen
Aspen Times: “A District Court judge has deemed election records in Jefferson County open to public review and has awarded attorney’s fees to Aspen election activist Marilyn Marks, who was denied access to the information. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Brigadier General Mark Martins is, at this hour, giving the following address to the New York City Bar Association:   Remarks of Brigadier General Mark Martins Chief Prosecutor, Military Commissions To the New York City Bar Association Tuesday, January 10, 2011 “Legitimacy and Comparative Law in Reformed Military Commissions” Good evening, and thank you, Jim, for that generous introduction and for the warm hospitality you have shown Kate and me and our… [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 6:20 am
In a January 14, 2014 ruling, Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman issued a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that plaintiff Time Square Foods Imports LLC’s motion to reopen the case and execute the consent judgment entered into with defendant Ursa Philbin in open court before Judge Pitman. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
Coach fumbled the ball on several evidentiary issues, but the case boiled down to the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 9:07 am by Marcel Pemsel
However, the statement in that case was made in the context of whether a trade mark has a reputation in the entire EU, even though it is just known within a substantial part. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am by Alessandro Cerri
In a recent decision ([2023] EWCA Civ 1451) which is relevant to all trade mark practitioners, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales (the Court) has departed from EU case-law and held that the defence of statutory acquiescence, in respect of UK trade mark infringement, only requires that the owner of the earlier mark have knowledge of use of a later registered mark for five years, and not knowledge of its registration. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:01 am by Dennis Crouch
However, if the case gets to trial, the patentee then has the burden of proving that it complied with Section 287 (either showing that the products were marked or they didn’t need to be marked). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:17 pm by The Docket Navigator
With intent to deceive at the forefront of false marking cases, plaintiffs are getting quite specific in their pleadings of just how deceptive false marking practices can be:Plaintiff was deceived into choosing a Butterball Turkey when looking to buy at the grocery store and noticed the added convenience of a lifting device included in the Butterball Turkey packaging. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:28 pm
Mark Zamora, who also graduated from the Cumberland School of Law like we did, has an excellent set of request for production of documents for use in a truck wreck case. [read post]