Search for: "Matter of Arthur"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,977
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Latest Proposed CEQA Legislation (SB 122) Seeks To Reform Administrative Record Process – At A Price
22 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm
., “CEQA, Sausages, And The Art Of The Possible: A Closer Look At SB 743’s General CEQA Reform Provisions” by Arthur F. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
It doesn’t know if it is Arthur or Martha (what are the odds of the parties in fact being called Arthur and Martha in real life I wonder?). [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:14 pm
The fact of the matter is that Marx perfectly well understood this - but he also understood that this was a one sided liberal view of capitalism that equated it purely with exchange. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
The DIMA matter is particularly instructive on the resourcing of compliance departments. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:18 pm
Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Arthur M. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm
As an initial matter, since the Department’s notice of exemption was never sent to the state Office of Planning and Research or otherwise filed, it did not trigger the short 35-day statute of limitations under Public Resources Code § 21167(d) and CEQA Guidelines § 15062(d), and the appropriate limitations period was therefore CEQA’s maximum one: 180 days after the agency’s decision to approve the project. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
Likewise, not one of the witnesses attributed knowledge of that alleged motive to Pai (or Skilling, for that matter). [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 11:30 pm
Rel. 343, 346 (1985) (citing Arthur Kornhaber, M.D. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the matter styled APHA v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm
In a published decision filed September 15, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded a trial court’s post-judgment order granting an unsuccessful CEQA petitioner’s motion to tax the entire $64,144 cost bill of respondent City. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:07 pm
“Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
” Ultimately, the determination of whether or not the Complex could “reasonably be beneficially used without the Project … is not a matter of law but instead requires a weighing of the competing interests laying claim on the Complex” — a weighing entrusted to the City’s discretion subject only to deferential judicial review for “substantial evidence” support. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
In concluding “that the health risks to workers and residents identified by petitioners do not constitute ‘substantial adverse effects on human beings’ or otherwise create a fair argument that the disturbance of contaminated soil may have a significant effect on the environment[,]” the Court stated as a prefatory matter: “To begin with, and while we need not and do not decide the issue here, we note that it is far from clear that adverse effects confined… [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:38 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
• A complaint received from a third party in a litigation matter opposed in interest to the Licensee personally. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
BUT see 8 JMRIPL 80 (2008) on ownership of inventions wherein inventors work for different companies, covering the recent Lucent/Microsoft/Fraunhofer matter (543 F.3d 710 (Fed. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:13 pm
No matter, it's a good one. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:26 pm
The 2008 regulations required retrofitting and upgrading of large diesel vehicles to the equivalent of 2010 or newer model engines to reduce emissions of diesel particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and greenhouse gases (GHGs). [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
