Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1361 - 1380
of 14,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
Leverages priority into market you weren’t intending to enter/were entering for merchandising only; exacerbates mark depletion issues. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:17 pm
But if we weren't discrimination and instead a statistical error, wouldn't at least one state have its women making the same as its men--or even a little more? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
The answer to that question is, probably not – but it doesn’t matter. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 4:50 pm
Since you don’t always know exactly what you need to do at the beginning of each le [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
This marks the third annual appearance of this memo, which by US standards makes it a tradition. [read post]
4 Apr 2005, 3:05 pm
" Perhaps its a leftover mentality from my years in English Lit, but I always made sure never to mark up a page. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 1:01 am
Claim 1 of all of these new main requests or sole requests specified that the touch parameters comprised "a duration and a position of the touch" and were directed to the detection of the input for so-called "continuous panning" or "panning once" by means of both the duration and the location of the touch.1.2 Thus at an early stage in the course of the examination proceedings the appellant replaced and withdrew its requests seeking protection for any… [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:45 pm
No matter how strongly we appreciate something or relate to it deep down, if we can’t convince others that it fits in our boring, ordered system of perpetual uneventfulness, it’s outlawed. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
Via Jed Lewison, actually they do: Barack Obama has jumped to a 15-point lead over the Republicans in Congress in trust to handle job creation, a sign the beleaguered president’s $450 billion jobs package has hit its mark in public opinion. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:05 pm
By: Mark Stepanyuk Patent Law and Section 101 Overview The Patent Act was enacted pursuant to Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the Constitution, which allows for Congress “[t]o Promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to . . . [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:02 am
Id. at 636 (stating that "[t]his problem arises in a variety of different contexts and in many permutations; matters of degree are involved and there is probably no single rule that resolves all situations"). [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:00 pm
But Logevall and Osgood make an important point that their critics will agree with: political history matters beyond the academy. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 11:49 am
Thus, it doesn’t matter if Rules 373 and 12(b)(3) might permit proof of mailing by a legible postmark, since plaintiff didn’t have one – the APC label indicated that the plaintiff might have mailed his envelope on April 3, but nothing more. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 2:39 pm
Don't forget to subscribe to this feed in your feed reader (we recommend Google Reader). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
by Mark P. [read post]
8 May 2022, 1:43 am
The issue of bad faith is rarely raised before the UK IPO in trade mark matters. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Michel and John T. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Michel and John T. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:31 am
Section 2(a), in pertinent part, prohibits registration of “matter which may … falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:32 am
Trademark Application for the mark SNOOKI. [read post]
