Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1361 - 1380
of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2009, 10:07 am
The question in the title of this post is prompted by this new article in USA Today, which is headlined "Appeal of Madoff's 150-year sentence wouldn't matter. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:59 pm
Hey, you're brilliant--but it doesn't matter. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
And that strikes me as a purely constitutional matter, a role of government matter. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:41 am
However, the rules do allow voluntary disclaimers of otherwise registrable matter. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Speaking very narrowly, I agree with Mark about balls and strikes: the size of the strike zone shouldn’t vary. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:01 pm
MARK WAID: Like all good comic book superheroes, he manages to squeeze an awful lot in a 24 hour day. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
He believed that the mark was not the subject of litigation, because he'd represented Constellation since at least 1964 and was familiar with Constellation's trademark affairs, including matters involving the Arbor Mist mark. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
There’s no hard threshold for misleadingness, and while 9.2% isn’t overwhelming, the court couldn’t conclude it was insubstantial as a matter of law. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
Putting those glossy summer catalogues down, it is worth giving an enlightened glance to the '5 stars logo' and '4 stars logo' trade mark cases, respectively T-686/13 and T-687/13, decided earlier this week by the General Court.The Court gave rulings in two appeals lodged by the French company Unibail Management against the refusals of the two figurative Community trade mark (CTM) applications represented on the right and below,… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:32 pm
The power of a Community collective mark, when contrasted with a protected geographical indication, was put to the test on 2 October, in Cases T-624/13 , T-625/13, 626/13 and 627/13 The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Delta Lingerie Intervening (Jeremy again). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
My reports about my own condition did not seem to matter to anyone else. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
Mark R. [read post]
14 May 2009, 7:48 am
Which type of business leader are you Mark? [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:08 am
"The Board then reviewed its precedents on failure-to-function refusals, observing once again that "[t]he critical inquiry in determining whether a proposed mark functions as a trademark is how the relevant public perceives it. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:31 am
The economists whose names we know, buy the way, aren’t shocked in the least at our race to the bottom, but somewhere there are other economists and they’re constantly “shocked that the recovery isn’t . [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:53 am
It shouldn’t come as a surprise that this is turning into a complicated mess – the change in the law is seeking to re-write history in relation to 16 years’ worth of CTMs, which is something in the region of 660,000 current registrations.Why not just decide on a mark-per-mark basis? [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:31 pm
This Tuesday, it also marks the 90th anniversary of women voting for the first time in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 7:49 am
Without that, his claim failed as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 6:33 am
Today marks a complete change in Proctor In Admiralty. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
AT&T v. [read post]
