Search for: "Mitchell v. Mitchell" Results 1361 - 1380 of 3,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2015, 10:52 am by Kent Scheidegger
Woodall, decided one year ago today, the Supreme Court reviewed its precedent in Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am by Nick Hilborne, Litigation Futures
Alida Coates, partner in the asbestos-related disease team at Irwin Mitchell, acted for the McDonald family. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:42 am by Michael Froomkin
Mitchell with 6 percent and Jackson Rip Holmes with 1 percent. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm by Michael Froomkin
There are six candidates for Coral Gables Commission Group V, so it will not take many votes to get a win in what has recently been a low-turnout election. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 8:31 am by Howard Friedman
 Claims regarding denial of feathers, off-site pow-wows and purification lodge ceremonies were dismissed.In Mitchell v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Mitchell, 184 AD2d 466, 468 [1st Dept. 1992] [Discussing post-readiness delay]). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 6:07 pm by Michael Froomkin
Our household has gotten more mailers from the Newell campaign than from any other two campaigns in Group V combined. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm by Giles Peaker
Davis Solicitors LLP v Raja & Anor [2015] EWHC 519 (QB) A cautionary tale on how, when things go badly wrong, it is, by and large, better not to take active steps to make them worse. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
Mitchell, 828 N.E.2d 323 (Illinois Court of Appeals 2005).While Illinois courts have not specifically addressed the placement of a GPS tracking device in the context of this tort, other jurisdictions provide guidance. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said the petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Article 78 of the CPLR to review a determination of the respondent, City of New York, Department of Housing Preservation and Development (hereafter referred to as "HPD"), which purported to deny Petitioner's appeal for family succession rights pursuant to 28 RCNY§3-02(p) concerning a Mitchell-Lama apartment Petitioner occupies with his wife and nine children. [read post]